Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions among third sector organisations: a systematic review

被引:125
|
作者
Bach-Mortensen, Anders Malthe [1 ]
Lange, Brittany C. L. [1 ]
Montgomery, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Social Policy & Intervent, Barnett House,32 Wellington Sq, Oxford OX1 2ER, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Dept Social Policy Sociol & Criminol, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE | 2018年 / 13卷
关键词
Evidence-based intervention; EBI; evidence-based practice; EBP; third-sector organisation; TSO; Implementation; Barriers; Facilitators; Enablers; Obstructers; Charities; Non-profits; CBO; NGO; COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS; HIV-PREVENTION INTERVENTIONS; ADDICTION TREATMENT; PROVIDER PERSPECTIVES; STAFF PERCEPTIONS; BUSINESS-LIKE; PROGRAMS; HEALTH; LESSONS; PARTNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-018-0789-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The third sector is becoming a growing provider of public, social, and health services. However, there is little evidence on the effectiveness of third sector organisations (TSOs), and their capacity to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs). Understanding implementation aspects of service delivery remains an important issue in clinical practice, but is poorly understood in the context of TSOs. This is problematic, since implementation issues are known to be critical for effective intervention outcomes. Objectives: To identify and synthesise existing research on what barriers and facilitators influence the implementation process of TSOs delivering EBIs. Methods: This review is reported according to PRISMA guidelines and was pre-registered in PROSPERO. Key databases were searched using relevant terms, experts in the field were contacted, and websites were reviewed. All identified studies were double-screened, and data were extracted independently by two authors. Included studies were synthesised using thematic analysis and were quality appraised. Results: Thirty-one studies were included, most of which were conducted in North America. The thematic synthesis identified resource limitations, in particular staff and finance, to be the most reported barrier to TSOs implementing EBIs. Organisational culture, including factors such as alignment between the mission of the TSO and EBI, and support/ prioritisation of the implementation process were the most reported facilitators. These findings generalise across the included studies and are robust to study quality assessment. Conclusions: While it is often assumed that good outcomes follow when implementing interventions that have been developed and tested according to best practice, little attention has been paid to how EBIs are best transported, contextualised, and implemented by third sector providers. This systematic review found that TSOs faced considerable challenges in implementing EBIs, which were primarily a lack of support and expertise, and unclear/insufficient guidelines on how to adapt EBIs to different populations. To address these challenges, it is important to engage with central stakeholders, such as funders, researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, to discuss how these needs can be met.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions among third sector organisations: a systematic review
    Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen
    Brittany C. L. Lange
    Paul Montgomery
    Implementation Science, 13
  • [2] Evaluation of Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Evidence-Based Practice in the Health Services: A Systematic Review
    Ayoubian, Ali
    Nasiripour, Amir Ashkan
    Tabibi, Seyed Jamaledin
    Bahadori, Mohammadkarim
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 9
  • [3] What are the barriers and facilitators for third sector organisations (non-profits) to evaluate their services? A systematic review
    Bach-Mortensen, Anders Malthe
    Montgomery, Paul
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [4] What are the barriers and facilitators for third sector organisations (non-profits) to evaluate their services? A systematic review
    Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen
    Paul Montgomery
    Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [5] Barriers and Facilitators of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Chronic Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review
    Goldsmith, Elizabeth S.
    Miller, Wendy A.
    Koffel, Erin
    Ullman, Kristen
    Landsteiner, Adrienne
    Stroebel, Benjamin
    Hill, Jessica
    Ackland, Princess E.
    Wilt, Timothy J.
    Duan-Porter, Wei
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 24 (05): : 742 - 769
  • [6] Barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based physical activity interventions: a qualitative systematic review
    Jemima Cooper
    Joey Murphy
    Catherine Woods
    Femke Van Nassau
    Aisling McGrath
    David Callaghan
    Paula Carroll
    Paul Kelly
    Niamh Murphy
    Marie Murphy
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18
  • [7] Barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based physical activity interventions: a qualitative systematic review
    Cooper, Jemima
    Murphy, Joey
    Woods, Catherine
    Van Nassau, Femke
    McGrath, Aisling
    Callaghan, David
    Carroll, Paula
    Kelly, Paul
    Murphy, Niamh
    Murphy, Marie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [8] Evidence-Based Practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions
    Scurlock-Evans, Laura
    Upton, Penney
    Upton, Dominic
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2014, 100 (03) : 208 - 219
  • [9] Barriers, Facilitators, Process and Sources of Evidence for Evidence-Based Management among Health Care Managers: A Qualitative Systematic Review
    Hasanpoor, Edris
    Hajebrahimi, Sakineh
    Janati, Ali
    Abedini, Zahra
    Haghgoshayie, Elaheh
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2018, 28 (05) : 665 - 680
  • [10] Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing an Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Model
    Schriger, Simone H.
    Knowles, Molly
    Daglieri, Talia
    Kangovi, Shreya
    Beidas, Rinad S.
    JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2024, 5 (03): : E240034