Electric light commercial vehicles for a cleaner urban goods distribution. Are they cost competitive?

被引:26
作者
Scorrano, Mariangela [1 ]
Danielis, Romeo [1 ]
Giansoldati, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trieste, Dipartimento Sci Econ Aziendali Matemat & Stat Br, Via Univ 1, I-34123 Trieste, Italy
关键词
Electric vehicle; Light commercial vehicle; Total cost of ownership; Threshold price; Urban goods distribution; FREIGHT; TRANSPORTATION; ACCEPTANCE; LOGISTICS; DELIVERY; MOBILITY; ADOPTION; DRIVERS; SERVICE; TRUCKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper investigates the cost competitiveness of electric light commercial vehicles (eLCVs) with respect to their petrol and diesel counterparts. We develop a detailed total cost of ownership (TCO) model incorporating all relevant costs with special attention to account for variations in engine efficiency between urban and sub-urban trips and by seasons of the year. The model generates two metrics: the threshold purchase price and the threshold annual distance travelled, which are used to compare among propulsion systems and to perform policy scenarios. The model is applied to a large selection of LCVs models available in Europe as of June 2019. We find that eLCVs have on average a higher TCO/km than their conventional counterparts. Yet, the existing offer of eLCVs is differentiated and some eLCV models are cost competitive. We find that four eLCV models belonging to the city and panel segments are convenient relative to their diesel counterparts for daily distances travelled lower than 93 km. Nonetheless, with financial and regulatory incentives, 100% urban driving, and 100% home/depot charging, most of the existing city and panel eLCV models are cost competitive with respect to both their diesel and petrol counterparts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
ACEA European Automobile Manufacturers Association, 2017, FACTSH
[2]  
ACEA-European Automobile Manufacturers Association, 2018, POS PAP EUR COMM PRO
[3]  
ACEA-European Automobile Manufacturers Association, REP
[4]   Environmental impacts and behavioral drivers of deep decarbonization for transportation through electric vehicles [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 225 :1209-1219
[5]  
Arroyo J. L., 2019, CENT EUR J OPER RES, P1
[6]   Cost Projection of State of the Art Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles Up to 2030 [J].
Berckmans, Gert ;
Messagie, Maarten ;
Smekens, Jelle ;
Omar, Noshin ;
Vanhaverbeke, Lieselot ;
Van Mierlo, Joeri .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (09)
[7]  
Cambridge Systematics, 2004, ACC COMM VEH URB TRA
[8]  
Camilleri P., 2017, J. of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, V7, P337
[9]   The effect of electric vehicles on urban noise maps [J].
Campello-Vicente, Hector ;
Peral-Orts, Ramon ;
Campillo-Davo, Nuria ;
Velasco-Sanchez, Emilio .
APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2017, 116 :59-64
[10]   A stated choice experiment to measure the effect of informational and normative conformity in the preference for electric vehicles [J].
Cherchi, Elisabetta .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 100 :88-104