Beyond the Buzzword: A Framework for an Indigenous Relational Evaluation in Traditional Communities in Ghana

被引:3
作者
Boadu, Evans S. [1 ,2 ]
Ile, Isioma [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Cape, Sch Govt, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Western Cape, Sch Publ Hlth, Cape Town, South Africa
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
culturally responsive evaluation; cultural values; Ghana; relational stakeholders; indigenous evaluation; CONSTRUCTIVIST GROUNDED THEORY; PARTICIPATION; GOVERNANCE; ENGAGEMENT; CONTEXTS; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1177/10982140211048459
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The notions of indigenous knowledge and cultural philosophies are becoming ubiquitous in many social inquiries and evaluation is no exception. Nonetheless, the pursuit to making evaluation impulses embedded in indigenous philosophies relevant in evaluation activities is yet to succeed. Thus, the article discusses the indigenous relational philosophies, approaches and practices of evaluation. Using qualitative research approaches, the study interviewed 43 indigenous development leaders and other local representatives in three local government areas in Ghana. Utilising evidence synthesis approaches through a triangulation process, the paper realised that indigenous knowledge and other cultural ethos were distinct in community-based development evaluation process. The study grasped that there is an elusive intersection between indigenous and contemporary evaluation paradigms. It was observed that former has principles such as community spirit, mutual trust, self-organisation, relational patterns or networks, "ubuntu" ideals, consensus building, collectiveness inter alia that can complement the latter for effective and efficient evaluation of community development programmes and social policies. The article identified key indigenous elements and other indigenous relational assessment patterns to design an indigenously driven relational evaluation framework. The evaluative competencies embedded in indigenous philosophies are vast, thus, a call for future research is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 488
页数:22
相关论文
共 60 条
[11]   Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method [J].
Bowen, Glenn A. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (02) :27-+
[12]  
Bowman NR, 2015, EVAL SOCIET, P335
[13]   Nation-to-Nation Evaluation: Governance, Tribal Sovereignty, and Systems Thinking through Culturally Responsive Indigenous Evaluations [J].
Bowman , Nicole .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PROGRAM EVALUATION, 2019, 34 (02) :343-356
[14]   Looking Backward but Moving Forward Honoring the Sacred and Asserting the Sovereign in Indigenous Evaluation [J].
Bowman-Farrell, Nicole R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2018, 39 (04) :543-568
[15]  
Boyce AS, 2017, CAN J PROGRAM EVAL, V32, P266, DOI 10.3138/cjpe.31132
[16]   EvalIndigenous Origin Story: Effective Practices within Local Contexts to Inform the Field and Practice of Evaluation [J].
Bremner, Larry ;
Bowman, Nicole .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PROGRAM EVALUATION, 2020, 34 (03) :425-441
[17]  
Carden F., 2012, J MULTIDISCIPLINARY, V8, P1556
[18]   The Power of Constructivist Grounded Theory for Critical Inquiry [J].
Charmaz, Kathy .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2017, 23 (01) :34-45
[19]  
Chilisa B., 2015, A synthesis on the made in African evaluation concept
[20]  
Chilisa B., 2005, Research methods for adult educators in Africa