Clinical Significance of 18F-FDG-PET in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

被引:26
作者
Fujii, Takaaki [1 ,2 ]
Yajima, Reina [1 ,2 ]
Kurozumi, Sasagu [2 ]
Higuchi, Toru [2 ]
Obayashi, Sayaka [2 ]
Tokiniwa, Hideaki [2 ]
Nagaoka, Rin [2 ]
Takata, Daisuke [2 ]
Horiguchi, Jun [2 ]
Kuwano, Hiroyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg Sci, 3-39-22 Showa Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 3718511, Japan
[2] Gunma Univ Hosp, Breast & Endocrine Surg, Gunma, Japan
关键词
FDG-PET; invasive lobular carcinoma; breast cancer; size; nuclear grade; PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FDG-PET/CT; TOMOGRAPHY; NODES;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.11129
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The diagnostic utility of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) for breast cancer is controversial. The histological type or tumor size of breast cancer has been reported to be associated with a greater likelihood of positive FDG uptake. Compared to invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs), invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) have a lower level of FDG uptake and are detected at a significantly lower sensitivity. The role of preoperative FDG-PET for ILCs may, thus, be limited. Few data evaluating the significance of FDG-PET in ILCs are available. Here, we evaluated the clinical significance of FDG-PET for ILC patients. We retrospectively investigated the cases of 196 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer who were diagnosed as having ILC (n=15) or IDC (n=181) and underwent FDG-PET preoperatively. Fifteen (7.7%) of patients were histopathologically diagnosed as ILC. A univariate analysis revealed that tumor size, extent of tumor, estrogen receptor (ER) expression and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression were significantly different between the ILC and IDC groups. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values of the primary tumors were not significantly different between the two groups but, regardless of the larger size of tumor or ductal spread, the SUVmax was relatively lower in the ILC group compared to the IDC group. The tumors in two ILC cases showed no FDG uptake. Among the ILC cases, there were linear associations between SUVmax and tumor size and between SUVmax and the nuclear grade by Pearson correlation (r=0.447, p=0.048 and r=0.519, p=0.024, respectively). Our findings imply that the preoperative FDG uptake in ILC may be reflective of the tumor size and the nuclear grade of the tumor. FDG uptake may be useful and predictive of aggressive features or prognosis in ILC patients.
引用
收藏
页码:5481 / 5485
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Allred DC, 1998, MODERN PATHOL, V11, P155
  • [2] Utility of 18F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer
    Aogi, Kenjiro
    Kadoya, Takayuki
    Sugawara, Yoshifumi
    Kiyoto, Sachiko
    Shigematsu, Hideo
    Masumoto, Norio
    Okada, Morihito
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 150 (01) : 209 - 217
  • [3] Avil N, 2000, J CLIN ONCOL, V15, P3495
  • [4] Biologic correlates of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in human breast cancer measured by positron emission tomography
    Bos, R
    van der Hoeven, JJM
    van der Wall, E
    van der Groep, P
    van Diest, PJ
    Comans, EFI
    Joshi, U
    Semenza, GL
    Hoekstra, OS
    Lammertsma, AA
    Molthoff, CFM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) : 379 - 387
  • [5] Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cooper, K. L.
    Harnan, S.
    Meng, Y.
    Ward, S. E.
    Fitzgerald, P.
    Papaioannou, D.
    Wyld, L.
    Ingram, C.
    Wilkinson, I. D.
    Lorenz, E.
    [J]. EJSO, 2011, 37 (03): : 187 - 198
  • [6] PET in breast cancer
    Flanagan, FL
    Dehdashti, F
    Siegel, BA
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (04) : 290 - 302
  • [7] Fujii T, 2016, ANTICANCER RES, V36, P3019
  • [8] Fujii T, 2016, ANTICANCER RES, V36, P1785
  • [9] Fujii T, 2016, ANTICANCER RES, V36, P393
  • [10] Association between [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognostic parameters in breast cancer
    Gil-Rendo, A.
    Martinez-Regueira, F.
    Zornoza, G.
    Garcia-Velloso, M. J.
    Beorlegui, C.
    Rodriguez-Spiteri, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (02) : 166 - 170