In vivo and in silico monitoring bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis of the mouse femur

被引:11
|
作者
Fu, Ruisen [1 ]
Bertrand, David [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Jianing [1 ]
Kavaseri, Kyle [2 ,3 ]
Feng, Yili [1 ]
Du, Tianming [1 ]
Liu, Youjun [1 ]
Willie, Bettina M. [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Haisheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Fac Environm & Life, Dept Biomed Engn, 100 Pingleyuan, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Pediat Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Shriners Hosp Children Canada, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Distraction osteogenesis; Finite element analysis; In vivo micro-CT; Mouse femur; Mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation; MECHANO-REGULATION; MODEL; ANGIOGENESIS; STRESS; STRAIN; MICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106679
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a mechanobiological process of producing new bone by gradual and controlled distraction of the surgically separated bone segments. Mice have been increasingly used to study the role of relevant biological factors in regulating bone regeneration during DO. However, there remains a lack of in silico DO models and related mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithms for mouse bone. This study sought to establish an in silico model based on in vivo experimental data to simulate the bone regeneration process during DO of the mouse femur. Methods: In vivo micro-CT, including time-lapse morphometry was performed to monitor the bone regeneration in the distraction gap. A 2D axisymmetric finite element model, with a geometry originating from the experimental data, was created. Bone regeneration was simulated with a fuzzy logic-based two-stage (distraction and consolidation) mechano-regulatory tissue differentiation algorithm, which was adjusted from that used for fracture healing based on our in vivo experimental data. The predictive potential of the model was further tested with varied distraction frequencies and distraction rates. Results: The computational simulations showed similar bone regeneration patterns to those observed in the micro-CT data from the experiment throughout the DO process. This consisted of rapid bone formation during the first 10 days of the consolidation phase, followed by callus reshaping via bone remodeling. In addition, the computational model predicted a faster and more robust bone healing response as the model's distraction frequency was increased, whereas higher or lower distraction rates were not conducive to healing. Conclusions: This in silico model could be used to investigate basic mechanobiological mechanisms involved in bone regeneration or to optimize DO strategies for potential clinical applications. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mechanoresponsive regulation of tissue regeneration during distraction osteogenesis
    Hu, Wenzhong
    Guo, Zeyou
    Tang, Weibing
    Long, Jie
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2024, 38 (18):
  • [22] Radiographic classification of osteogenesis during bone distraction
    Li, R
    Saleh, M
    Yang, L
    Coulton, L
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2006, 24 (03) : 339 - 347
  • [23] Inhibitory effect of nicotine on bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Ma, Li
    Zheng, Li Wu
    Cheung, Lim Kwong
    FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2007, 12 : 3256 - 3262
  • [24] Bone regeneration and fracture healing - Experience with distraction osteogenesis model
    Richards, M
    Goulet, JA
    Weiss, JA
    Waanders, NA
    Schaffler, MB
    Goldstein, SA
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1998, (355) : S191 - S204
  • [25] Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis: Mechano-regulation by shear strain and fluid velocity
    Isaksson, Hanna
    Comas, Olivier
    van Donkelaar, Corrinus C.
    Mediavilla, Jesus
    Wilson, Wouter
    Huiskes, Rik
    Ito, Keita
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 40 (09) : 2002 - 2011
  • [26] Distraction osteogenesis at the site of previously cystic bone lesion of femur: A case report
    Idulhaq, Mujaddid
    Santoso, Asep
    Mariyanto, Ismail
    Utomo, Pamudji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2021, 84
  • [27] Effects of Piezoelectric Surgery on Bone Regeneration Following Distraction Osteogenesis of Mandible
    Tosun, Emre
    Bilgic, Meric
    Yildirim, Benay
    Tuz, Hakan Hifzi
    Ozer, Taha
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [28] Deferoxamine Enhances the Vascular Response of Bone Regeneration in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Donneys, Alexis
    Farberg, Aaron S.
    Tchanque-Fossuo, Catherine N.
    Deshpande, Sagar S.
    Buchman, Steven R.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (04) : 850 - 856
  • [29] Sensory Nerves Affect Bone Regeneration in Rabbit Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Cao, Jian
    Zhang, Shijian
    Gupta, Anand
    Du, Zhaojie
    Lei, Delin
    Wang, Lei
    Wang, Xudong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 16 (06): : 831 - 837
  • [30] Experimental studies on the effect of osteotomy technique on the bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis
    Krawczyk, Artur
    Kuropka, Piotr
    Kuryszko, Jan
    Wall, Andrzej
    Dragan, Szymon
    Kulej, Miroslaw
    BONE, 2007, 40 (03) : 781 - 791