Past experiences with surprise medical bills drive issue knowledge, concern and attitudes toward federal policy intervention

被引:11
作者
Callaghan, Timothy [1 ]
Haeder, Simon F. [2 ]
Sylvester, Steven [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 212 Adriance Lab Rd,1266 TAMU, College Stn, TX USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Sch Publ Policy, 322 Pond Lab, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Utah Valley Univ, Dept Hist & Polit Sci, 800 West Univ Pkwy, Orem, UT USA
关键词
Health policy; medical bills; public opinion; surprise billing; HEALTH-INSURANCE LITERACY; OF-NETWORK BILLS; PHYSICIAN NETWORKS; PUBLIC-OPINION; PRIMARY-CARE; MARKETPLACE; SURGERY; ACCESS; PLANS;
D O I
10.1017/S1744133121000281
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Scholars and journalists have devoted considerable attention to understanding the circumstances in which Americans receive surprise medical bills. Previous research on this issue has focused on the scope of the problem, including the conditions that are most likely to lead to surprise bills. However, the existing literature has almost exclusively relied on claims data, limiting our understanding of consumer experiences and attitudes toward policy changes to address surprise billing. Using a survey administered to a nationally representative sample of 4998 Americans, we analyze consumer experiences with surprise billing, knowledge of the issue, how concerned Americans are about receiving surprise bills and how past experiences influence policy preferences toward federal action on surprise billing. Our analysis demonstrates that knowledge and concern about surprise billing are the highest among the educated and those who have previously received a surprise bill. These factors also predict support for federal policy action, with high levels of support for federal policy action across the population, including among both liberals and conservatives. However, more detailed federal policy proposals receive significantly less support among Americans, suggesting that stand-alone policy action may not be viable. Our results show bipartisan support among American consumers for federal action on surprise billing in the abstract but no consistent views on specific policy proposals.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 331
页数:34
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] Adler L, 2017, HLTH AFFAIRS BL 0201, DOI [10.1377/hblog20170201.058570/full/, DOI 10.1377/HBLOG20170201.058570/FULL]
  • [2] Adler L., 2019, State Approaches to Mitigating Surprise Out-of-Network Billing USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, Report on the economic well-being of U.S. households in 2018 - May 2019
  • [4] Building Health Insurance Literacy: Evidence from the Smart Choice Health Insurance™ Program
    Bartholomae, Suzanne
    Russell, Mia B.
    Braun, Bonnie
    McCoy, Teresa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2016, 37 (02) : 140 - 155
  • [5] Curbing Surprise Medical Bills Can Be a Window Into Cost Control
    Bindman, Andrew
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (20): : 2065 - 2066
  • [6] Blumenthal D, 2010, HEART OF POWER: HEALTH AND POLITICS IN THE OVAL OFFICE, P1
  • [7] Bluth, 2019, NATL PUBLIC RADIO
  • [8] Bluth Rachel, 2019, KAISER HLTH NEWS
  • [9] Boccuti C., 2016, Paying a Visit to the Doctor: Current Financial Protections for Medicare Patients When Receiving Physician Services
  • [10] Why Is Health Reform So Difficult?
    Brady, David W.
    Kessler, Daniel P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 2010, 35 (02) : 161 - 175