An Analysis of Web-scale Discovery Services From the Perspective of User's Relevance Judgment

被引:6
作者
Lee, Boram [1 ]
Chung, EunKyung [1 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, 52 Ewhayeodae Gil, Seoul 03760, South Korea
关键词
Web-scale discovery; Relevance ranking; Search effectiveness; Relevance judgment; user's perspective; User-oriented; SEARCH ENGINE; ACADEMIC-LIBRARY; TOOLS; PERFORMANCE; CATALOG; RECALL; OPACS;
D O I
10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.016
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Although web-scale discovery services have been implemented increasingly worldwide, there is a need for the exploration of search effectiveness from users' perspectives. In this sense, this study examined web-scale discovery services in the view of users' relevance judgment comparing to individual databases in the fields of Education and Library and Information Science. Using four search topics for the EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS), ERIC, ERC, LISA, and LISTA, their search effectiveness were measured in terms of modified precision, recall, and reciprocal rank based on the relevance judgments of four participants. Comparison of the measurements showed that the web-scale discovery service was less effective than individual databases. In particular, EDS's effectiveness was lower than that of ERIC and ERC in terms of modified precision and recall. The modified reciprocal rank of EDS was lower than those of most individual databases in the fields of Education and LIS. Moreover, the relationship between the rankings from EDS and those from four participants was weak, as indicated by Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients (0.141 in Education and 0.170 in LIS). In fact, the effectiveness in the fields of LIS and Education of EDS was lower than those individual databases to a degree dependent on the field. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 534
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Librarians' and Information Professionals' Perspectives Towards Discovery Tools - An Exploratory Study [J].
Aharony, Noa ;
Prebor, Gila .
JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2015, 41 (04) :429-440
[2]  
Breeding M., 2014, Library Technology Reports, V50, P5
[3]  
Brennan DP, 2012, PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING RESOURCE DISCOVERY TOOLS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARIES, P44, DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-1821-3.ch003
[4]   Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources [J].
Brophy, J ;
Bawden, D .
ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 57 (06) :498-512
[5]  
Bull Stephen, 2014, New Review of Academic Librarianship, V20, P137, DOI 10.1080/13614533.2014.897238
[6]   On discovery tools, OPACs and the motion of library language [J].
Caplan, Priscilla .
LIBRARY HI TECH, 2012, 30 (01) :108-115
[7]   Evaluation and Comparison of Discovery Tools: An Update [J].
Chickering, F. William ;
Yang, Sharon Q. .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND LIBRARIES, 2014, 33 (02) :5-30
[8]   Estimating the recall performance of Web search engines [J].
Clarke, SJ ;
Willett, P .
ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 49 (07) :184-189
[9]   Usability testing of VuFind at an academic library [J].
Denton, William ;
Coysh, Sarah J. .
LIBRARY HI TECH, 2011, 29 (02) :301-319
[10]   Coverage, relevance, and ranking: The impact of query operators on web search engine results [J].
Eastman, CM ;
Jansen, BJ .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, 21 (04) :383-411