Comparative modeling of biological nutrient removal from landfill leachate using a circulating fluidized bed bioreactor (CFBBR)

被引:22
作者
Eldyasti, Ahmed [1 ]
Andalib, Mehran [2 ]
Hafez, Hisham [1 ]
Nakhla, George [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jesse [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Landfill leachate; Circulating fluidized bed; Nitrification; Denitrification; AQUIFASw (R); BioWin (R); IMPROVED COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; BIOFILM REACTOR SYSTEMS; FILM ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; SIMULTANEOUS CARBON; NITROGEN REMOVAL; WASTE-WATER; AQUIFAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.115
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Steady state operational data from a pilot scale circulating fluidized bed bioreactor (CFBBR) during biological treatment of landfill leachate, at empty bed contact times (EBCTs) of 0.49, and 0.41 d and volumetric nutrients loading rates of 2.2-2.6 kg COD/(m(3) d), 0.7-0.8 kg N/(m(3) d), and 0.014-0.016 kg P/(m(3) d), was used to calibrate and compare developed process models in BioWin (R) and AQUIFAS (R). BioWin (R) and AQUIFAS (R) were both capable of predicting most of the performance parameters such as effluent TKN, NH4-N, NO3-N, TP, PO4-P, TSS, and VSS with an average percentage error (APE) of 0-20%. BioWin (R) under-predicted the effluent BOD and SBOD values for various runs by 80% while AQUIFAS (R) predicted effluent BOD and SBOD with an APE of 50%. Although both calibrated models, confirmed the advantages of the CFBBR technology in treating the leachate of high volumetric loading and low biomass yields due to the long solid retention time (SRT), both BioWin (R) and AQUIFAS (R) predicted the total biomass and SRT of CFBBR based on active biomass only, whereas in the CFBBR runs both active as well as inactive biomass accumulated. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 149
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
*APHA AWWA WEF, 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[2]   A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems [J].
Barker, DJ ;
Stuckey, DC .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (14) :3063-3082
[3]   General model for biological nutrient removal activated-sludge systems: model presentation [J].
Barker, PS ;
Dold, PL .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1997, 69 (05) :969-984
[4]   Mathematical modelling of biofilms and biofilm reactors for engineering design [J].
Boltz, J. P. ;
Morgenroth, E. ;
Sen, D. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 62 (08) :1821-1836
[5]  
Bushey J., 2009, P WATER ENV FED, V12, P4453, DOI [10.2175/193864709793953700, DOI 10.2175/193864709793953700]
[6]   Load maximization of a liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed bioreactor for nitrogen removal from synthetic municipal wastewater [J].
Chowdhury, Nabin ;
Nakhla, George ;
Zhu, Jesse .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2008, 71 (05) :807-815
[7]   Pilot-scale Experience with Biological Nutrient Removal and Biomass Yield Reduction in a Liquid-solid Circulating Fluidized Bed Bioreactor [J].
Chowdhury, Nabin ;
Nakhla, George ;
Zhu, Jesse ;
Islam, Mohammad .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2010, 82 (09) :772-781
[8]  
COMEAU Y, 2008, P WAT ENV FED TECHN, V3, P266
[9]   Simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal in anoxic-aerobic circulating fluidized bed biological reactor (CFBBR) [J].
Cui, Y ;
Nakhla, G ;
Zhu, J ;
Patel, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 25 (06) :699-712
[10]   Biological nutrient removal from leachate using a pilot liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed bioreactor (LSCFB) [J].
Eldyasti, Ahmed ;
Chowdhury, Nabin ;
Nakhla, George ;
Zhu, Jesse .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2010, 181 (1-3) :289-297