Perceived Teacher Autonomy Support and School Engagement of Tibetan Students in Elementary and Middle Schools: Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy and Academic Emotions

被引:46
作者
Li, Wei [1 ]
Gao, Wenyang [2 ]
Sha, Jingrong [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Minzu Univ, Sch Educ Sci & Technol, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
Tibetan areas; elementary and middle school students; teacher autonomy support; self-efficacy; academic emotions; school engagement; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; SOCIAL-CONTEXT; DROP-OUT; ADOLESCENCE; ACHIEVEMENT; PERCEPTIONS; BEHAVIORS; CLASSROOM; MATTER; VALUES;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00050
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
School engagement (SE) refers to the intensity and quality of emotions experienced by students when commencing and carrying out learning activities, and includes behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. A high SE level promotes academic achievement, reduces students' behavioral problems, and prevents school dropout. This study, whose participants were 819 students from Tibetan areas, explored the impact of teacher autonomy support (TAS) on students' SE and the mechanisms involved in this relationship. The results showed that TAS had a positive impact on SE, while students' self-efficacy had a mediating effect between TAS and SE. On the one hand, TAS affected self-efficacy through academic interest and ultimately influenced SE; moreover, TAS negatively affected academic anxiety, indirectly inhibiting the negative effect of academic anxiety on SE through self-efficacy. The theoretical and practical implications of the study findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Relationship Between Social Context, Self-Efficacy, Motivation, Academic Achievement, and Intention to Drop Out of High School: A Longitudinal Study [J].
Alivernini, Fabio ;
Lucidi, Fabio .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 104 (04) :241-252
[2]  
An X., 2007, China, V5, P309
[3]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Minority languages of China
[5]  
[Anonymous], ED MEAS EVAL
[6]   Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct [J].
Appleton, James J. ;
Christenson, Sandra L. ;
Furlong, Michael J. .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2008, 45 (05) :369-386
[7]   Students' Oppositional Behaviors and Engagement in School: The Differential Role of the Student-Teacher Relationship [J].
Archambault, Isabelle ;
Vandenbossche-Makombo, Jade ;
Fraser, Sarah L. .
JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2017, 26 (06) :1702-1712
[8]   Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety [J].
Assor, A ;
Kaplan, H ;
Kanat-Maymon, Y ;
Roth, G .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2005, 15 (05) :397-413
[9]  
Awang-Hashim R, 2008, MALAYS J LEARN INSTR, V5, P21
[10]   Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology [J].
Bandalos, Deborah L. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 15 (02) :211-240