Qualitative protocol for understanding the contribution of Australian policy in the urban planning, justice, energy and environment sectors to promoting health and health equity

被引:19
|
作者
Baum, Fran [1 ]
Delany-Crowe, Toni [1 ]
Fisher, Matthew [1 ]
MacDougall, Colin [2 ]
Harris, Patrick [3 ]
McDermott, Dennis [4 ]
Marinova, Dora [5 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Southgate Inst Hlth Soc & Equ, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Flinders Univ S Australia, Poche Ctr Indigenous Hlth & Wellbeing, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Curtin Univ, Sustainabil Policy Inst, Perth, WA, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 09期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
public health; qualitative research; health policy; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS; FRAMEWORK; LAND;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025358
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction A well-established body of literature demonstrates that health and equity are strongly influenced by the consequences of governments' policy and resultant actions (or inactions) outside the health sector. Consequently, the United Nations, and its agency the WHO, have called for national leadership and whole-of-government action to understand and address the health impacts of policies in all sectors. This research responds to that call by investigating how policymaking in four sectorsurban planning, justice, energy and environmentmay influence the social determinants of health and health equity (SDH/HE). Methods and analysis The research design is informed by a critical qualitative approach. Three successive stages are included in the design. The first involves analysing all strategic policy documents and selected legislative documents from the four sectors (n=583). The document analysis is based on a coding framework developed to identify alignment between the documents and the SDH/HE. Two policies that demonstrate good practice in regard to SDH/HE will be selected from each sector during the second stage for embedded case study analysis (total n=8). This is intended to illuminate which factors have supported recognition and action on SDH/HE in the selected policies. The third stage involves progressive theoretical integration and development to understand political and institutional facilitators and barriers to action on SDH/HE, both within and between sectors. Ethics and dissemination The research will provide much needed evidence about how coherent whole-of-government action on SDH/HE can be advanced and contribute knowledge about how health-enhancing policy activity in the four sectors may be optimised. Learnings from the research will be shared via a project advisory group, policy briefings, academic papers, conference presentations and research symposia. Ethics approval has been secured for the embedded case studies, which involve research participants.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] How well do Australian government urban planning policies respond to the social determinants of health and health equity?
    McGreevy, Michael
    Harris, Patrick
    Delaney-Crowe, Toni
    Fisher, Matt
    Sainsbury, Peter
    Riley, Emily
    Baum, Fran
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 99
  • [2] Health-Promoting Spatial Planning: Approaches for Strengthening Urban Policy Integration
    Lowe, Melanie
    Whitzman, Carolyn
    Giles-Corti, Billie
    PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2018, 19 (02) : 180 - 197
  • [3] Can health and health equity be advanced by urban planning strategies designed to advance global competitiveness? Lessons from two Australian case studies
    McGreevy, Michael
    Harris, Patrick
    Delany-Crowe, Toni
    Fisher, Matt
    Sainsbury, Peter
    Baum, Fran
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 242