Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting private and social information

被引:124
作者
Grueter, Christoph [1 ]
Czaczkes, Tomer J. [1 ]
Ratnieks, Francis L. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Lab Apiculture & Social Insects, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, Falmer BN1 9QG, England
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Lasius niger; Foraging; Pheromone trails; Route memory; Decision making; RECRUITMENT BEHAVIOR; TRAIL PHEROMONE; ORIENTATION; HYMENOPTERA; CUES; COMMUNICATION; SIGNALS; MEMORY; ORGANIZATION; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00265-010-1020-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Foragers of many ant species use pheromone trails to guide nestmates to food sources. During foraging, individual workers can also learn the route to a food source. Foragers of the mass-recruiting ant Lasius niger use both pheromone trails and memory to locate a food source. As a result, an experienced forager can have a conflict between social information (trail pheromones) and private information (route memory) at trail bifurcations. We tested decision making in L. niger foragers facing such an informational conflict in situations where both the strength of the pheromone trail and the number of previous visits to the food source varied. Foragers quickly learned the branch at a T bifurcation that leads to a food source, with 74.6% choosing correctly after one previous visit and 95.3% after three visits. Pheromone trails had a weaker effect on choice behaviour of na < ve ants, with only 61.6% and 70.2% choosing the branch that had been marked by one or 20 foragers versus an unmarked branch. When there was a conflict between private and social information, memory overrides pheromone after just one previous visit to a food source. Most ants, 82-100%, chose the branch where they had collected food during previous foraging trips, with the proportion depending on the number of previous trips (1 v. 3) but not on the strength of the pheromone trail (1 v. 20). In addition, the presence of a pheromone trail at one branch in a bifurcation had no effect on the time it took an experienced ant to choose the correct branch (the branch without pheromone). These results suggest that private information (navigational memory) dominates over social information (chemical tail) in orientation decisions during foraging activities in experienced L. niger foragers.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1971, The Insect Societies
[2]   MEMORY AND CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION IN THE ORIENTATION OF 2 MASS-RECRUITING ANT SPECIES [J].
ARON, S ;
BECKERS, R ;
DENEUBOURG, JL ;
PASTEELS, JM .
INSECTES SOCIAUX, 1993, 40 (04) :369-380
[3]   Signals and cues in the recruitment behavior of stingless bees (Meliponini) [J].
Barth, Friedrich G. ;
Hrncir, Michael ;
Jarau, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 194 (04) :313-327
[4]  
Bates D., 2007, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF
[5]   TRAIL LAYING BEHAVIOR DURING FOOD RECRUITMENT IN THE ANT LASIUS-NIGER (L) [J].
BECKERS, R ;
DENEUBOURG, JL ;
GOSS, S .
INSECTES SOCIAUX, 1992, 39 (01) :59-72
[6]   MODULATION OF TRAIL LAYING IN THE ANT LASIUS-NIGER (HYMENOPTERA, FORMICIDAE) AND ITS ROLE IN THE COLLECTIVE SELECTION OF A FOOD SOURCE [J].
BECKERS, R ;
DENEUBOURG, JL ;
GOSS, S .
JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 1993, 6 (06) :751-759
[7]   COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING THROUGH FOOD RECRUITMENT [J].
BECKERS, R ;
DENEUBOURG, JL ;
GOSS, S ;
PASTEELS, JM .
INSECTES SOCIAUX, 1990, 37 (03) :258-267
[8]  
BECKERS R, 1989, Psyche (Cambridge), V96, P239, DOI 10.1155/1989/94279
[9]   How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants [J].
Beverly, Blair D. ;
McLendon, H. ;
Nacu, S. ;
Holmes, S. ;
Gordon, D. M. .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 20 (03) :633-638
[10]   Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution [J].
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Brooks, Mollie E. ;
Clark, Connie J. ;
Geange, Shane W. ;
Poulsen, John R. ;
Stevens, M. Henry H. ;
White, Jada-Simone S. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2009, 24 (03) :127-135