Analysis on shadow price and abatement potential of carbon dioxide in China's provincial industrial sectors

被引:6
作者
Xue, Zhaoquan [1 ]
Mu, Hailin [1 ]
Li, Nan [1 ]
Zhang, Ming [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Ocean Energy Utilizat & Energy Conservat, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Shadow price; Technical inefficiency; Abatement potential; Directional distance function; Industrial sector; DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE FUNCTION; REDUCING CO2 EMISSIONS; POWER-PLANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; WATER TREATMENT; COSTS; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-16465-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
CO2 emission performance evaluation is crucial to make abatement policies. Knowledge about the potential and costs of CO2 reduction could provide information guides for policymakers and help them implement targeted measures. However, relevant studies are rarely subdivided into detailed industrial sectors, and results are lack of inter-industry comparisons. To fill this gap, this study estimates provincial technical inefficiency, abatement potential, and shadow price of CO2 from fuel combustion in China's 25 industries in 2001-2017. Results show that China's industry could ideally reduce CO2 emissions by a further 22.01-33.27%, averaging 1645.96 MtCO(2). Technical efficiency, abatement potential, and cost vary across provinces and industries and should therefore be fully considered when designing emission reduction targets and control policies. Provinces and industries with low technical efficiency, large-scale emissions, great abatement potential and low shadow price are the key to emission reduction. We thus identify key provinces and industries that need to take on more abatement responsibility. Those findings are of great significance to the formulation of carbon reduction targets and the implementation of abatement policies, and prove the feasibility of China's trans-regional carbon trading. It is suggested to prioritize key industries into the trading system and further promote inter-provincial cooperation through carbon trading.
引用
收藏
页码:14604 / 14623
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Shadow prices and pollution costs in US agriculture
    Färe, R
    Grosskopf, S
    Weber, WL
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 56 (01) : 89 - 103
  • [12] Characteristics of a polluting technology:: theory and practice
    Färe, R
    Grosskopf, S
    Noh, DW
    Weber, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2005, 126 (02) : 469 - 492
  • [13] DERIVATION OF SHADOW PRICES FOR UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS - A DISTANCE FUNCTION-APPROACH
    FARE, R
    GROSSKOPF, S
    LOVELL, CAK
    YAISAWARNG, S
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1993, 75 (02) : 374 - 380
  • [14] The Shadow Prices of Carbon Emissions in China's Planting Industry
    Guan, Xiaoliang
    Zhang, Junbiao
    Wu, Xianrong
    Cheng, Linlin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (03):
  • [15] Gupta M, 2006, SSRN ELECT J
  • [16] Environmentally sensitive productivity analysis of the Canadian pulp and paper industry, 1959-1994: An input distance function approach
    Hailu, A
    Veeman, TS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 40 (03) : 251 - 274
  • [17] Measuring the Effect of Economic Growth on Countries' Environmental Efficiency: A Conditional Directional Distance Function Approach
    Halkos, George E.
    Managi, Shunsuke
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 (03) : 753 - 775
  • [18] International Energy Agency (IEA), 2018, Global Energy & CO2 Data
  • [19] Shadow price of CO2 emissions in Indian thermal power sector
    Jain R.K.
    Kumar S.
    [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2018, 20 (4) : 879 - 902
  • [20] Sources of airline productivity from carbon emissions: an analysis of operational performance under good and bad outputs
    Lee, Boon Liat
    Wilson, Clevo
    Pasurka, Carl A., Jr.
    Fujii, Hidemichi
    Managi, Shunsuke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2017, 47 (03) : 223 - 246