Predicting age of atheism: credibility enhancing displays and religious importance, choice, and conflict in family of upbringing

被引:15
作者
Langston, Joseph [1 ]
Speed, David [2 ]
Coleman, Thomas J., III [3 ]
机构
[1] Atheist Res Collaborat, Colorado Springs, CO 80829 USA
[2] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Psychol, St John, NB, Canada
[3] Coventry Univ, Ctr Adv Behav Sci, Sci Brain Belief & Behav Res Lab, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
Credibility enhancing displays; atheism; religious conflict; religious choice; parental quality; religious socialization; cognitive science of religion; BELIEF; FAITH; SECULARIZATION; SOCIALIZATION; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1080/2153599X.2018.1502678
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
The cultural learning concept of Credibility Enhancing Displays (CREDs) concerns the extent to which behavioral models consistently live out their professed ideals. While researchers have suggested that past CRED exposure is an important variable for predicting who does and does not become a religious believer, it is unclear how CREDs relate to when a person rejects the religious beliefs modeled to them during their upbringing. Using a large sample of formerly believing atheists, two analyses assessed the ability of CREDs to predict the age at which an individual became an atheist. In the first analysis (n = 5,153), CREDs were positively associated with a delay in Age of Atheism, with family-level religious variables (Religious Importance, Religious Choice, and Religious Conflict) moderating this relationship. In the second analysis (n = 3,210), CREDs remained a stable predictor of Age of Atheism while controlling for demographics, parental quality, religious variables, relational variables, and institutional variables. Overall, while findings support a robust relation of CREDs to atheistic outcomes even when controlling for many other variables that influence religious transmission processes, they also highlight the importance of considering how such other variables modify the impact of CREDs on (non)religious outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 67
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, SACRED SECULAR RELIG
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1971, NATURE REINFORCEMENT
  • [3] Bandura A., 2003, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, V13, P167, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327582IJPR1303_02
  • [4] The unbearable automaticity of being
    Bargh, JA
    Chartrand, TL
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (07) : 462 - 479
  • [5] Cognitive Science of Religion: What Is It and Why Is It?
    Barrett, Justin L.
    [J]. RELIGION COMPASS, 2007, 1 (06): : 768 - 786
  • [6] Barry CarolynMcNamara., 2014, Emerging Adults' Religiousness and Spirituality, P76
  • [7] Bringing Up Nones: Intergenerational Influences and Cohort Trends
    Bengtson, Vern L.
    Hayward, R. David
    Zuckerman, Phil
    Silverstein, Merril
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2018, 57 (02) : 258 - 275
  • [8] Bengtson VernL., 2013, Families and Faith: How Religion Is Passed Down Across Generations
  • [9] Berkers E., 2018, EUROPEAN SOC
  • [10] When was secularization? Dating the decline of the British churches and locating its cause
    Bruce, Steve
    Glendinning, Tony
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2010, 61 (01) : 107 - 126