Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies

被引:1
|
作者
Karabin, James [1 ,2 ]
Mansfield, Izaac [3 ,4 ]
Frow, Emma K. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, T Denny Sanford Sch Social & Family Dynam, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Future Innovat Soc, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ USA
[5] Arizona State Univ, Sch Biol & Hlth Syst Engn, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 09期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
TRANSITION; GOVERNANCE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0257327
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The field of synthetic biology is increasingly being positioned as a key driver of a more sustainable, bio-based economy, and has seen rapid industry growth over the past 15 years. In this paper we undertake an exploratory investigation of the relationship between sustainability and synthetic biology, identifying and analyzing sustainability-related language on the public websites of 24, US-based synthetic biology companies. We observe that sustainability is a visible part of the self-presentation of the nascent synthetic biology industry, explicitly mentioned by 18 of the 24 companies. The dominant framing of sustainability on these company websites emphasizes environmental gains and "free-market" approaches to sustainability, with little explicit mention of social dimensions of sustainability such as access, justice or intergenerational equity. Furthermore, the model of sustainability presented focuses on incremental transition towards environmental sustainability through direct substitution of products and processes using bioengineered alternatives (n = 16 companies), with no change in societal consumption or policy frameworks required in order to see sustainability gains. One-third of the companies analyzed (n = 8) mention "nature" on their websites, variously framing it as a resource to be managed or as a source of inspiration; whether the latter signals a potentially more complex relationship with nature than advanced free-market models of sustainability remains to be seen. As the synthetic biology industry begins to grow in size and visibility, we suggest this is an opportune time for the community to engage in explicit deliberation about its approach to sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rethinking sustainability through synthetic biology
    Kovelakuntla, Vamsi
    Meyer, Anne S.
    NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 17 (06) : 630 - 631
  • [2] US COMPETITIVENESS IN SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
    Gronvall, Gigi Kwik
    HEALTH SECURITY, 2015, 13 (06) : 378 - 389
  • [3] Rethinking sustainability through synthetic biology
    Vamsi Kovelakuntla
    Anne S. Meyer
    Nature Chemical Biology, 2021, 17 : 630 - 631
  • [4] Synthetic biology in China, UK and US
    Chen, Guo-Qiang
    Feng, Yan
    SYNTHETIC AND SYSTEMS BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 1 (04) : 215 - 215
  • [5] Assessing the sustainability of water companies: A synthetic indicator approach
    Molinos-Senante, Maria
    Cunha Marques, Rui
    Perez, Fatima
    Gomez, Trinidad
    Sala-Garrido, Ramon
    Caballero, Rafael
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 61 : 577 - 587
  • [6] Exploring and assessing construction companies ' ESG performance in sustainability
    Lei, Xue
    Zhao, Kunjian
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (03):
  • [7] When companies improve the sustainability of the natural environment: A study of large US companies
    De Mendonca, Taryn
    Zhou, Yan
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (03) : 801 - 811
  • [8] Exploring Synthetic and Systems Biology at the University of Edinburgh
    Fletcher, Liz
    Rosser, Susan
    Elfick, Alistair
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 44 : 692 - 695
  • [9] Exploring Political Views on Synthetic Biology in the Netherlands
    Rerimassie, Virgil
    NANOETHICS, 2016, 10 (03) : 289 - 308
  • [10] Exploring biological possibility through synthetic biology
    Tero Ijäs
    Rami Koskinen
    European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2021, 11