Peering into the pharmaceutical "pipeline": Investigational drugs, clinical trials, and industry priorities

被引:34
作者
Fisher, Jill A. [1 ]
Cottingham, Marci D. [1 ]
Kalbaugh, Corey A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Social Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Epidemiol, Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Pharmaceuticals; Clinical trials; R&D; Pharmaceuticalization; Cancer; Mental illness; HIV/AIDS; Global burden of disease; PARTICIPATION; INNOVATION; POLITICS; ILLNESS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.023
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In spite of a growing literature on pharmaceuticalization, little is known about the pharmaceutical industry's investments in research and development (R&D). Information about the drugs being developed can provide important context for existing case studies detailing the expanding and often problematic role of pharmaceuticals in society. To access the pharmaceutical industry's pipeline, we constructed a database of drugs for which pharmaceutical companies reported initiating clinical trials over a five-year period (July 2006 June 2011), capturing 2477 different drugs in 4182 clinical trials. Comparing drugs in the pipeline that target diseases in high-income and low-income countries, we found that the number of drugs for diseases prevalent in high-income countries was 3.46 times higher than drugs for diseases prevalent in low-income countries. We also found that the plurality of drugs in the pipeline was being developed to treat cancers (26.2%). Interpreting our findings through the lens of pharmaceuticalization, we illustrate how investigating the entire drug development pipeline provides important information about patterns of pharmaceuticalization that are invisible when only marketed drugs are considered. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 330
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   A comparative analysis of drug safety withdrawals in the UK and the US (1971-1992): Implications for current regulatory thinking and policy [J].
Abraham, J ;
Davis, C .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (05) :881-892
[2]   Pharmaceuticalization of Society in Context: Theoretical, Empirical and Health Dimensions [J].
Abraham, John .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 44 (04) :603-622
[3]  
Angell M., 2004, TRUTH DRUG CO THEY D, V1st ed.
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, MED RES HIRE POLITIC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Drugs for Life: How Phar ma ceu ti cal Companies Define Our Health
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, GLOBAL STATUS REPORT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EXPT TRAVEL CLIN TRI
[8]  
Applbaum K, 2009, HASTINGS CENT REP, V39, P13
[9]   Getting to Yes: Corporate Power and the Creation of a Psychopharmaceutical Blockbuster [J].
Applbaum, Kalman .
CULTURE MEDICINE AND PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 33 (02) :185-215
[10]   PharmAD-ventures: A Feminist Analysis of the Pharmacological Imaginary of Alzheimer's Disease [J].
Asberg, Cecilia ;
Lum, Jennifer .
BODY & SOCIETY, 2009, 15 (04) :95-117