Validation of the French version of the expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale with anchor BPRS-E(A)

被引:18
作者
Mouaffak, F. [1 ,2 ]
Morvan, Y. [1 ,2 ]
Bannour, S. [1 ,2 ]
Chayet, M. [1 ,2 ]
Bourdel, M. -C. [1 ,2 ]
Thepaut, G. [3 ]
Kazes, M. [1 ,2 ]
Guelfi, J. -D. [4 ]
Millet, B. [3 ]
Olie, J. -P. [1 ,2 ]
Krebs, M. -O [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Psychiat & Neurosci, INSERM, U894, LPMP, Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Fac Med Paris Descartes, Serv Hosp Univ Sante Mentale & Therapeut, Ctr Hosp St Anne, F-75674 Paris 14, France
[3] Univ Rennes 1, Ctr Hosp Guillaume Regnier, F-35703 Rennes 7, France
[4] Univ Paris 05, Ctr Hosp St Anne, Fac Med Paris Descartes, CMME, F-75674 Paris 14, France
来源
ENCEPHALE-REVUE DE PSYCHIATRIE CLINIQUE BIOLOGIQUE ET THERAPEUTIQUE | 2010年 / 36卷 / 04期
关键词
French translation of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS); Validation; Principal component analysis; Rating scale; Psychosis; BPRS; 24; RECENT-ONSET SCHIZOPHRENIA; LOW CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; RELIABILITY; DIMENSIONS; SAMPLE; RATERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.encep.2009.04.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction. - The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale was initially developed as a rapid method to assess symptom change in psychiatric inpatients of various diagnoses. The original version was expanded to an 18-item version and thereafter to a 24-item version to increase sensitivity to a broader range of psychotic and affective symptoms. The latest version of the expanded 24-item BPRS provides probe questions and detailed anchor points for the ratings for each item. Literature findings. - Studies have shown the expanded and anchored 24-item BPRS to be a sensitive and effective measure of psychiatric symptoms with good interrater reliability that can be maintained over time. To our knowledge, there are eight published papers including factor analyses of the BPRS-E(A). While many similarities are evident between these studies, inconsistencies are apparent that may have been due to sample size, characteristics and / or methodological differences in the factor analysis computation. Among these studies, six provided a four-factor solution. There was no French version of this scale available. Methods. - After its translation into French and back translation, we investigated the validity of the French BPRS-E(A) version. We carried out a component analysis on the data of 111 participants of various diagnoses, mostly hospitalised for a first psychotic episode, yielding to a three-factor solution (positive symptoms disorganisation; depression-anxiety and negative symptoms). Results. - A good internal consistency and interrater reliability were found. These results confirm the psychometric value of the BPRS-E(A) in its French version. We compared those findings to earlier reports; similarities and differences are discussed. (C) L'Encephale, Paris, 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 301
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1976, ECDEU ASSESSMENT MAN
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1986, Introduction to classical and modern test theory
  • [3] Burger GK, 1997, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V53, P451, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199708)53:5<451::AID-JCLP5>3.3.CO
  • [4] 2-0
  • [5] A confirmatory factor analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in a homeless sample
    Burger, GK
    Yonker, RD
    Calsyn, RJ
    Morse, GA
    Klinkenberg, WD
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (04) : 192 - 196
  • [6] SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS
    CATTELL, RB
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) : 245 - 276
  • [7] CHAYET M, 2008, ENCEPHALE, V32, P12
  • [8] Comfrey A., 1992, A first course in factor analysis
  • [9] A structured interview guide increases Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale reliability in raters with low clinical experience
    Crippa, JAS
    Sanches, RF
    Hallak, JEC
    Loureiro, SR
    Zuardi, AW
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 103 (06) : 465 - 470
  • [10] COMPONENT STRUCTURE OF THE EXPANDED BRIEF PSYCHIATRIC RATING-SCALE (BPRS-E)
    DINGEMANS, PMAJ
    LINSZEN, DH
    LENIOR, ME
    SMEETS, RMW
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 122 (03) : 263 - 267