Women's preferences for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding

被引:11
|
作者
van den Brink, Marian J. [1 ]
Beelen, Pleun [2 ,3 ]
Herman, Malou C. [3 ]
Claassen, Nathalie J. J. [2 ]
Bongers, Marlies Y. [3 ,4 ]
Geomini, Peggy M. [3 ]
van der Steeg, Jan Willem [5 ]
van den Wijngaard, Lotte [6 ]
van Wely, Madelon [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Grow Res Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[6] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Endometrial ablation; Heavy menstrual bleeding; Levonorgestrel intrauterine system; Patient preference; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS; BALLOON ABLATION; MENORRHAGIA; HEALTH; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; NOVASURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Women's preferences for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are important in clinical decision-making. Our aim was to investigate whether women with HMB have a preference for treatment characteristics of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or endometrial ablation and to assess the relative importance of these characteristics. Study Design: A discrete choice experiment was performed in general practices and gynaecology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. Women with HMB were asked to choose between hypothetical profiles containing characteristics of LNG-IUS or endometrial ablation. Characteristics included procedure performed by gynaecologist or general practitioner; reversibility of the procedure; probability of dysmenorrhea; probability of irregular bleeding; additional use of contraception; need to repeat the procedure after five years; and treatment containing hormones. Data were analysed using panel mixed logit models. The main outcome measures were the relative importance of the characteristics and willingness to make trade-offs. Results: 165 women completed the questionnaire; 36 (22%) patients were recruited from general practices and 129 (78%) patients were recruited from gynaecology outpatient clinics. The characteristic found most important was whether a treatment contains hormones. Women preferred a treatment without hormones, a treatment with the least side effects, and no need for a repeat procedure or additional contraception. Women completing the questionnaire at the gynaecology outpatient clinic differed from women in primary care in their preference for a definitive treatment to be performed by a gynaecologist. Conclusions: Whether or not a treatment contains hormones was the most important characteristic influencing patient treatment choice for HMB. Participants preferred characteristics that were mostly related to endometrial ablation, but were willing to trade-off between characteristics. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 147
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effectiveness of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
    Eralil G.J.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2016, 66 (Suppl 1) : 505 - 512
  • [42] Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System - First-Line Therapy for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
    Espey, Eve
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (02): : 184 - 185
  • [43] A retrospective cohort study comparing microwave endometrial ablation with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding
    Henshaw, R
    Coyle, C
    Low, S
    Barry, C
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 42 (02): : 205 - 209
  • [44] Endometrial ablation in the management of heavy menstrual bleeding
    Laberge, Philippe
    Leyland, Nicholas
    Murji, Ally
    Fortin, Claude
    Martyn, Paul
    Vilos, George
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2016, 38 (12) : S609 - S628
  • [45] Levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a first-line medical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding
    Nelson, Anita L.
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2010, 6 (03) : 347 - 356
  • [46] Mechanism of action of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding
    Cihangir, Uzuncakmak
    Ebru, Akbay
    Murat, Ekin
    Levent, Yasar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 123 (02) : 146 - 149
  • [47] Comparison of Combined Bipolar Radiofrequency Impedance-Controlled Endometrial Ablation with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System versus Bipolar Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation Alone in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
    Zhao, Hui
    Yang, Baojun
    Feng, Limin
    Li, Haixia
    Shang, Hongyu
    Zhao, Zhanqi
    Dai, Yinmei
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (03) : 774 - 780
  • [48] Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Versus Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Randomized Study
    Sesti, Francesco
    Piancatelli, Raffaella
    Pietropolli, Adalgisa
    Ruggeri, Velia
    Piccione, Emilio
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2012, 21 (08) : 851 - 857
  • [49] Endometrial ablation or resection versus levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Bergeron, Catherine
    Laberge, Philippe Y.
    Boutin, Amelie
    Theriault, Marie-Anne
    Valcourt, Florence
    Lemyre, Madeleine
    Maheux-Lacroix, Sarah
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2020, 26 (02) : 302 - 311
  • [50] A randomized prospective trial comparing the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system with thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding
    de Souza, Sergio S.
    Camargos, Aroldo F.
    de Rezende, Carolina P.
    Pereira, Francisco A. N.
    Araujo, Cicero A. A.
    Silva Filho, Agnaldo L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (03) : 226 - 231