Women's preferences for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding

被引:11
|
作者
van den Brink, Marian J. [1 ]
Beelen, Pleun [2 ,3 ]
Herman, Malou C. [3 ]
Claassen, Nathalie J. J. [2 ]
Bongers, Marlies Y. [3 ,4 ]
Geomini, Peggy M. [3 ]
van der Steeg, Jan Willem [5 ]
van den Wijngaard, Lotte [6 ]
van Wely, Madelon [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Grow Res Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[6] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Endometrial ablation; Heavy menstrual bleeding; Levonorgestrel intrauterine system; Patient preference; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS; BALLOON ABLATION; MENORRHAGIA; HEALTH; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; NOVASURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Women's preferences for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are important in clinical decision-making. Our aim was to investigate whether women with HMB have a preference for treatment characteristics of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or endometrial ablation and to assess the relative importance of these characteristics. Study Design: A discrete choice experiment was performed in general practices and gynaecology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. Women with HMB were asked to choose between hypothetical profiles containing characteristics of LNG-IUS or endometrial ablation. Characteristics included procedure performed by gynaecologist or general practitioner; reversibility of the procedure; probability of dysmenorrhea; probability of irregular bleeding; additional use of contraception; need to repeat the procedure after five years; and treatment containing hormones. Data were analysed using panel mixed logit models. The main outcome measures were the relative importance of the characteristics and willingness to make trade-offs. Results: 165 women completed the questionnaire; 36 (22%) patients were recruited from general practices and 129 (78%) patients were recruited from gynaecology outpatient clinics. The characteristic found most important was whether a treatment contains hormones. Women preferred a treatment without hormones, a treatment with the least side effects, and no need for a repeat procedure or additional contraception. Women completing the questionnaire at the gynaecology outpatient clinic differed from women in primary care in their preference for a definitive treatment to be performed by a gynaecologist. Conclusions: Whether or not a treatment contains hormones was the most important characteristic influencing patient treatment choice for HMB. Participants preferred characteristics that were mostly related to endometrial ablation, but were willing to trade-off between characteristics. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 147
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A randomised trial comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding
    Busfield, RA
    Farquhar, CM
    Sowter, MC
    Lethaby, A
    Sprecher, M
    Yu, Y
    Sadler, LC
    Brown, P
    Johnson, N
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (03) : 257 - 263
  • [22] Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System for Reducing Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
    Loeven, Michael
    Brown, Emily
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2021, 104 (02) : 138 - 139
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of a strategy starting with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) versus a strategy starting with endometrial ablation in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding
    van den Brink, M. J.
    Beelen, P.
    Herman, M. C.
    Geomini, P. M.
    Dekker, J. H.
    Vermeulen, K.
    Bongers, M. Y.
    Berger, M. Y.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 105 - 106
  • [24] Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding
    Hurskainen, R
    Paavonen, J
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 16 (06) : 487 - 490
  • [25] LEVONORGESTREL INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM AND MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE FOR TREATMENT OF HEAVY MENSTRUAL BLEEDING
    Kaunitz, A. M.
    Bissonnette, F.
    Monteiro, I
    Lukkari-Lax, E.
    Muysers, C.
    Jensen, J.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 80 (02) : 212 - 212
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel intrauterine system and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding
    Brown, P. M.
    Farquhar, C. M.
    Lethaby, A.
    Sadler, L. C.
    Johnson, N. P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (07) : 797 - 803
  • [27] Endometrial ablation for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding in women with bleeding disorders
    Huq, F. Y.
    Al-Haideri, M.
    Kadir, R. A.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2011, 17 (02) : 370 - 370
  • [28] Treatment of Women With an Endometrial Polyp and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device or Hysteroscopic Polypectomy?
    van Dijk, Myrthe M.
    van Hanegem, Nehalennia
    de Lange, Maria E.
    Timmermans, Anne
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2015, 22 (07) : 1153 - 1162
  • [29] Endometrial ablation for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding in women with bleeding disorders
    Huq, F. Y.
    Al-Haderi, M.
    Kadir, R. A.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2011, 127 : S139 - S139
  • [30] Effectiveness and outcomes of thermablate endometrial ablation system in women with heavy menstrual bleeding
    Al-Shaikh, Ghadeer
    Almalki, Ghada
    Bukhari, Mujahed
    Fayed, Amel
    Al-Mandeel, Hazem
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 37 (06) : 770 - 774