Women's preferences for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding

被引:11
|
作者
van den Brink, Marian J. [1 ]
Beelen, Pleun [2 ,3 ]
Herman, Malou C. [3 ]
Claassen, Nathalie J. J. [2 ]
Bongers, Marlies Y. [3 ,4 ]
Geomini, Peggy M. [3 ]
van der Steeg, Jan Willem [5 ]
van den Wijngaard, Lotte [6 ]
van Wely, Madelon [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Veldhoven, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Grow Res Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[6] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Endometrial ablation; Heavy menstrual bleeding; Levonorgestrel intrauterine system; Patient preference; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS; BALLOON ABLATION; MENORRHAGIA; HEALTH; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; NOVASURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Women's preferences for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are important in clinical decision-making. Our aim was to investigate whether women with HMB have a preference for treatment characteristics of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or endometrial ablation and to assess the relative importance of these characteristics. Study Design: A discrete choice experiment was performed in general practices and gynaecology outpatient clinics in the Netherlands. Women with HMB were asked to choose between hypothetical profiles containing characteristics of LNG-IUS or endometrial ablation. Characteristics included procedure performed by gynaecologist or general practitioner; reversibility of the procedure; probability of dysmenorrhea; probability of irregular bleeding; additional use of contraception; need to repeat the procedure after five years; and treatment containing hormones. Data were analysed using panel mixed logit models. The main outcome measures were the relative importance of the characteristics and willingness to make trade-offs. Results: 165 women completed the questionnaire; 36 (22%) patients were recruited from general practices and 129 (78%) patients were recruited from gynaecology outpatient clinics. The characteristic found most important was whether a treatment contains hormones. Women preferred a treatment without hormones, a treatment with the least side effects, and no need for a repeat procedure or additional contraception. Women completing the questionnaire at the gynaecology outpatient clinic differed from women in primary care in their preference for a definitive treatment to be performed by a gynaecologist. Conclusions: Whether or not a treatment contains hormones was the most important characteristic influencing patient treatment choice for HMB. Participants preferred characteristics that were mostly related to endometrial ablation, but were willing to trade-off between characteristics. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 147
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding
    Beelen, Pleun
    van den Brink, Marian J.
    Herman, Malou C.
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    Dekker, Janny H.
    Duijnhoven, Ruben G.
    Mak, Nienke
    van Meurs, Hannah S.
    Coppus, Sjors F.
    van der Steeg, Jan Willem
    Eising, Heleen P.
    Massop-Helmink, Diana S.
    Klinkert, Ellen R.
    Nieboer, Theodoor E.
    Timmermans, Anne
    van der Voet, Lucet F.
    Veersema, Sebastiaan
    Smeets, Nicol A. C.
    Schutte, Joke M.
    van Baal, Marchien
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Berger, Marjolein Y.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02)
  • [5] The levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    van den Brink, M. J.
    Beelen, P.
    Herman, M. C.
    Geomini, P. M.
    Dekker, J. H.
    Vermeulen, K. M.
    Bongers, M. Y.
    Berger, M. Y.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (12) : 2003 - 2011
  • [6] Levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) versus endometrial ablation (Novasure) in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Herman, Malou C.
    van den Brink, Marian J.
    Geomini, Peggy M.
    van Meurs, Hannah S.
    Huirne, Judith A.
    Eising, Heleen P.
    Timmermans, Anne
    Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
    Klinkert, Ellen R.
    Coppus, Sjors F.
    Nieboer, Theodoor E.
    Catshoek, Ruby
    van der Voet, Lucet F.
    van Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F.
    Graziosi, Giuseppe C. M.
    Veersema, Sebastiaan
    van Kesteren, Paul J.
    Langenveld, Josje
    Smeets, Nicol A. C.
    van Vliet, Huib A. A. M.
    van der Steeg, Jan Willem
    Lisman-van Leeuwen, Yvonne
    Dekker, Janny H.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Berger, Marjolein Y.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [7] Levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) versus endometrial ablation (Novasure) in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Malou C Herman
    Marian J van den Brink
    Peggy M Geomini
    Hannah S van Meurs
    Judith A Huirne
    Heleen P Eising
    Anne Timmermans
    Johanna MA Pijnenborg
    Ellen R Klinkert
    Sjors F Coppus
    Theodoor E Nieboer
    Ruby Catshoek
    Lucet F van der Voet
    Hugo WF van Eijndhoven
    Giuseppe CM Graziosi
    Sebastiaan Veersema
    Paul J van Kesteren
    Josje Langenveld
    Nicol AC Smeets
    Huib AAM van Vliet
    Jan Willem van der Steeg
    Yvonne Lisman-van Leeuwen
    Janny H Dekker
    Ben W Mol
    Marjolein Y Berger
    Marlies Y Bongers
    BMC Women's Health, 13
  • [8] Combined Endometrial Ablation and Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System Use in Women With Dysmenorrhea and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Novel Approach for Challenging Cases
    Papadakis, Efstathios P.
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Laughlin-Tommaso, Shannon K.
    Shazly, Sherif A. M.
    Hopkins, Matthew R.
    Breitkopf, Daniel M.
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (07) : 1203 - 1207
  • [9] The combined use of endometrial ablation or resection and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: A systematic review
    Oderkerk, Tamara J.
    van de Kar, Majorie M. A.
    van Der Zanden, Carlijn H. M.
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    Herman, Malou C.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (10) : 1779 - 1787
  • [10] The Combined Use of Endometrial Ablation or Resection and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: A Systematic Review
    Oderkerk, Tamara J.
    van de Kar, Majorie M. A.
    van der Zanden, Carlijn H. M.
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    Herman, Malou C.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2021, 76 (11) : 665 - 666