Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight

被引:0
|
作者
Martins, Tatiana [1 ,2 ]
Mussi, Thais Caldera [1 ]
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Ecoar Med Diagnest, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO | 2020年 / 18卷
关键词
Prostatectomy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Ultrasonography; Prostatic diseases; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; RELIABILITY; TURP;
D O I
10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO4662
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance of the prostate to estimate gland volume, comparing the results with transrectal ultrasound and surgical specimen. Methods: A retrospective study of 85 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound (for fusion image-guided biopsy) before radical prostatectomy. Prostate measurements were obtained from magnetic resonance axial and sagittal T2-weighted images and ultrasound; the prostate volume was determined using the ellipsoid formula. The results were compared with the surgical specimen weight. Maximum interval between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasound, and prostatectomy was 6 months. Results: The prostate volume measured by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was 18-157cm(3) (mean of 49.9cm(3)) and by transrectal ultrasound, 22-165cm(3) (mean of 54.9cm(3)); the surgical specimen weight was 20-154g (mean of 48.6g), with no statistical differences. Based on the values obtained from imaging examinations, the prostate volume obtained was very close to the real prostatic weight, and the measures by multiparametric magnetic resonance were slightly more precise. Conclusion: Prostate volume measured by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound showed similar values, and excellent agreement with real prostate weight of the surgical specimens. Prostate volume measured by magnetic resonance has been increasingly used in the clinical practice, and its value enables appropriate therapeutic planning and control of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in the measurement of prostate gland volume: Correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen volume
    Kelly, Jamie S.
    Oon, Sheng F.
    McDermott, Vincent
    Ryan, Paul
    Ryan, Peter C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 : 29 - 29
  • [2] Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Tewari, A
    Indudhara, R
    Shinohara, K
    Schalow, E
    Woods, M
    Lee, R
    Anderson, C
    Narayan, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1996, 24 (04) : 169 - 174
  • [3] COMPARISON OF PROSTATE VOLUME MEASURED BY TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Weiss, Brian
    Wein, Alan
    Malkowicz, S. Bruce
    Guzzo, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E828 - E828
  • [4] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy: a comparison with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Silecchia, G.
    Falagario, U.
    Sanguedolce, F.
    Macarini, L.
    Autorino, R.
    Cormio, L.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2018, 66 (04): : 200 - 204
  • [5] Visibility of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasound during fusion with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for biopsy
    van de Ven, Wendy J. M.
    Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel
    van der Leest, Marloes M. G.
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (04) : 745 - 750
  • [6] Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: Is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
    Weiss, Brian E.
    Wein, Alan J.
    Malkowicz, S. Bruce
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (08) : 1436 - 1440
  • [7] Comparison of prostate volume, shape, and contouring variability determined from preimplant magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images
    Liu, Derek
    Usmani, Nawaid
    Ghosh, Sunita
    Kamal, Wafa
    Pedersen, John
    Pervez, Nadeem
    Yee, Don
    Danielson, Brita
    Murtha, Albert
    Amanie, John
    Sloboda, Ron S.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2012, 11 (04) : 284 - 291
  • [8] Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Transrectal Ultrasound in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Study With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Zhang, Mingbo
    Tang, Jie
    Luo, Yukun
    Wang, Yiru
    Wu, Meng
    Memmott, Benjamin
    Gao, Jing
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (07) : 1823 - 1830
  • [9] Transperineal ultrasound for measurement of prostate volume: Validation against transrectal ultrasound
    Griffiths, Kaye A.
    Ly, Lam P.
    Jin, Bo
    Chan, Lewis
    Handelsman, David J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (04): : 1375 - 1379
  • [10] Comparing Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Estimation of Prostate Volume and its' Effect on Prostate Specific Antigen Density (PSAD)
    Lee, X. W.
    Ball, K.
    Khan, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 216 - 216