Sample size considerations for split-mouth design

被引:51
作者
Zhu, Hong [1 ]
Zhang, Song [1 ]
Ahn, Chul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Div Biostat, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
Continuous and binary outcomes; dental clinical trial; generalized estimating equation; sample size; split-mouth; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS; BINARY DATA; GEE;
D O I
10.1177/0962280215601137
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Split-mouth designs are frequently used in dental clinical research, where a mouth is divided into two or more experimental segments that are randomly assigned to different treatments. It has the distinct advantage of removing a lot of inter-subject variability from the estimated treatment effect. Methods of statistical analyses for split-mouth design have been well developed. However, little work is available on sample size consideration at the design phase of a split-mouth trial, although many researchers pointed out that the split-mouth design can only be more efficient than a parallel-group design when within-subject correlation coefficient is substantial. In this paper, we propose to use the generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach to assess treatment effect in split-mouth trials, accounting for correlations among observations. Closed-form sample size formulas are introduced for the split-mouth design with continuous and binary outcomes, assuming exchangeable and nested exchangeable correlation structures for outcomes from the same subject. The statistical inference is based on the large sample approximation under the GEE approach. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the finite-sample performance of the GEE sample size formulas. A dental clinical trial example is presented for illustration.
引用
收藏
页码:2543 / 2551
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Understanding and evaluating clinical trials [J].
Bigby, M ;
Gadenne, AS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 34 (04) :555-590
[2]   Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-mouth designs with baseline measurements [J].
Donner, A. ;
Zou, G. Y. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (18) :3476-3486
[3]   Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-cluster designs [J].
Donner, A ;
Klar, N ;
Zou, GY .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (04) :919-925
[4]  
Donner A., 2010, Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research
[5]   EFFICIENCY OF SPLIT-MOUTH DESIGNS [J].
HUJOEL, PP ;
LOESCHE, WJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1990, 17 (10) :722-728
[6]   Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE [J].
Jung, SH ;
Ahn, CW .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (17) :2583-2596
[7]   Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data [J].
Jung, SH ;
Ahn, C .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (08) :1305-1315
[8]   The design and analysis of split-mouth studies: What statisticians and clinicians should know [J].
Lesaffre, Emmanuel ;
Philstrom, Bruce ;
Needleman, Ian ;
Worthington, Helen .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (28) :3470-3482
[9]  
Liang K.Y., 1986, Biometrika, V84, P3
[10]   Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations [J].
Liu, GH ;
Liang, KY .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (03) :937-947