Influence of irrigation method and scheduling on patterns of soil and tree water status and its relation to yield and fruit quality in peach

被引:40
作者
Bryla, DR
Dickson, E
Shenk, R
Johnson, RS
Crisosto, CH
Trout, TJ
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Water Management Res Lab, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
[2] Univ Calif Parlier, Dept Plant Sci, Kearney Agr Ctr, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
关键词
Prunus persica; evapotranspiration; microirrigation; soil water content; stem water potential; water relations;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI.40.7.2118
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
A 3-year study was done to determine the effects of furrow, microspray, surface drip, and subsurface drip irrigation on production and fruit quality in mature 'Crimson Lady'peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] trees. Furrow and microspray irrigations were scheduled weekly or biweekly, which is common practice in central California, while surface and subsurface drip irrigations were scheduled daily. Trees were maintained at similar water potentials following irrigation by adjusting water applications as needed. Tree size and fruit number were normalized among treatments by pruning and thinning each season. Surface and subsurface drip produced the largest fruit on average and the highest marketable yields among treatments. Drip benefits appeared most related to the ability to apply frequent irrigations. Whether water was applied above or below ground, daily irrigations by drip maintained higher soil water content within the root zone and prevented cycles of water stress found between less-frequent furrow and microspray irrigations. With furrow and microsprays, midday tree water potentials reached as low as -1.4 MPa between weekly irrigations and -1.8 MPa between biweekly irrigations, which likely accounted for smaller fruit and lower yields in these treatments. To reduce water stress, more frequent irrigation is probably impractical with furrow systems but is recommended when irrigating during peak water demands by microspray.
引用
收藏
页码:2118 / 2124
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Spatial and temporal distribution of soil water balance for a drip-irrigated almond tree [J].
Andreu, L ;
Hopmans, JW ;
Schwankl, LJ .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1997, 35 (1-2) :123-146
[2]   Water use by drip-irrigated late-season peaches [J].
Ayars, JE ;
Johnson, RS ;
Phene, CJ ;
Trout, TJ ;
Clark, DA ;
Mead, RM .
IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2003, 22 (3-4) :187-194
[3]  
Berman ME, 1996, TREE PHYSIOL, V16, P859
[4]   Long-term effects of restricted root volume and regulated deficit irrigation con peach: II. Productivity and water use [J].
Boland, AM ;
Jerie, PH ;
Mitchell, PD ;
Goodwin, I ;
Connor, DJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2000, 125 (01) :143-148
[5]   Long-term effects of restricted root volume and regulated deficit irrigation on peach: I. Growth and mineral nutrition [J].
Boland, AM ;
Jerie, PH ;
Mitchell, PD ;
Goodwin, I .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2000, 125 (01) :135-142
[6]  
Bryla D. R., 2005, P CAL AGR SOC AM 1 2
[7]   Growth and production of young peach trees irrigated by furrow, microjet, surface drip, or subsurface drip systems [J].
Bryla, DR ;
Trout, TJ ;
Ayars, JE ;
Johnson, RS .
HORTSCIENCE, 2003, 38 (06) :1112-1116
[8]  
Camp CR, 1998, T ASAE, V41, P1353, DOI 10.13031/2013.17309
[9]  
CHALMERS DJ, 1988, P 4 INT C MICR AUSTR
[10]   IRRIGATION REGIMES AFFECT FRUIT SOLUBLE SOLIDS CONCENTRATION AND RATE OF WATER-LOSS OF O HENRY PEACHES [J].
CRISOSTO, CH ;
JOHNSON, RS ;
LUZA, JG ;
CRISOSTO, GM .
HORTSCIENCE, 1994, 29 (10) :1169-1171