The cost-effectiveness of a modestly effective HIV vaccine in the United States

被引:22
|
作者
Long, Elisa F. [1 ]
Owens, Douglas K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Management, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Dept Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Ctr Primary Care & Outcomes Res, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HIV vaccine; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Mathematical model; HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS; INJECTION-DRUG USERS; SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS; ACTIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; HETEROSEXUAL TRANSMISSION; RISK-REDUCTION; VIRAL LOAD; YOUNG MEN; SEX; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.013
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The recent RV144 clinical trial showed that an ALVAC/AIDSVAX prime-boost HIV vaccine regimen may confer partial immunity in recipients and reduce transmission by 31%. Trial data suggest that efficacy may initially exceed 70% but decline over the following 3.5 years. Estimating the potential health benefits associated with a one-time vaccination campaign, as well as the projected benefits of repeat booster vaccination, may inform future HIV vaccine research and licensing decisions. Methods: We developed a mathematical model to project the future course of the HIV epidemic in the United States under varying HIV vaccine scenarios. The model accounts for disease progression, infection transmission, antiretroviral therapy, and HIV-related morbidity and mortality. We projected HIV prevalence and incidence over time in multiple risk groups, and we estimated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs over a 10-year time horizon. We assumed an exponentially declining efficacy curve fit to trial data, and that subsequent vaccine boosters confer similar immunity. Variations in vaccine parameters were examined in sensitivity analysis. Results: Under existing HIV prevention and treatment efforts, an estimated 590,000 HIV infections occur over 10 years. One-time vaccination achieving 60% coverage of adults could prevent 9.8% of projected new infections over 10 years (and prevent 34% of new infections in the first year) and cost approximately $91,000/QALY gained relative to the status quo, assuming $500 per vaccination series. Targeted vaccination strategies result in net cost savings for vaccines costing less than $750. One-time vaccination of 60% of all adults coupled with three-year boosters only for men who have sex with men and people who inject drugs could prevent 21% of infections for $81,000/QALY gained relative to vaccination of higher risk sub-populations only. A program attaining 90% vaccination coverage prevents 15% of new HIV cases over 10 years (and approximately 50% of infections in the first year). Conclusions: A partially effective HIV vaccine with effectiveness similar to that observed in the RV144 trial would provide large health benefits in the United States and could meet conventionally accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds. Strategies that prioritize key populations are most efficient, but broader strategies provide greater total population health benefit. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6113 / 6124
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in the United States
    Eckman, Mark H.
    Talal, Andrew H.
    Gordon, Stuart C.
    Schiff, Eugene
    Sherman, Kenneth E.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 56 (10) : 1382 - 1393
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of implementing objective diagnostic verification of asthma in the United States
    Yaghoubi, Mohsen
    Adibi, Amin
    Zafari, Zafar
    Mark FitzGerald, J.
    Aaron, Shawn D.
    Johnson, Kate M.
    Sadatsafavi, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 145 (05) : 1367 - +
  • [23] A cost-effectiveness analysis of folic acid fortification policy in the United States
    Bentley, Tanya G. K.
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    Willett, Walter C.
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2009, 12 (04) : 455 - 467
  • [24] What will it take to make cost-effectiveness analysis acceptable in the United States?
    Luce, BR
    MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (07) : 44 - 48
  • [25] Expanded HIV Testing in Low-Prevalence, High-Income Countries: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for the United Kingdom
    Long, Elisa F.
    Mandalia, Roshni
    Mandalia, Sundhiya
    Alistar, Sabina S.
    Beck, Eduard J.
    Brandeau, Margaret L.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04):
  • [26] Reviewing the evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HIV prevention strategies in Thailand
    Pattanaphesaj, Juntana
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
  • [27] A Systematic Review on Cost Effectiveness of HIV Prevention Interventions in the United States
    Huang, Ya-Lin A.
    Lasry, Arielle
    Hutchinson, Angela B.
    Sansom, Stephanie L.
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 13 (02) : 149 - 156
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness of the NIMH multisite HIV prevention intervention
    Pinkerton S.D.
    Holtgrave D.R.
    Johnson-Masotti A.P.
    Turk M.E.
    Hackl K.L.
    DiFranceisco W.
    AIDS and Behavior, 2002, 6 (1) : 83 - 96
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness of raltegravir in HIV/AIDS
    Chaudhary, Mohammad Ashraf
    Elbasha, Elamin H.
    Kumar, Ritesh N.
    Nathanson, Esther C.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2011, 11 (06) : 627 - 639
  • [30] Cost-effectiveness of Universal and Targeted Hepatitis C Virus Screening in the United States
    Tatar, Moosa
    Keeshin, Susana W.
    Mailliard, Mark
    Wilson, Fernando A.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (09)