Outcomes of Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement in Children

被引:38
作者
Ibezim, Chizitam
Sarvestani, Amber Leila
Knight, Jessica H.
Qayum, Omar
Alshami, Noor
Turk, Elizabeth
St Louis, James
McCracken, Courtney
Moller, James H.
Kochilas, Lazaros
Raghuveer, Geetha
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Childrens Mercy Hosp, Ward Family Heart Ctr, Dept Pediat, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[4] Childrens Mercy Hosp, Ward Family Heart Ctr, Dept Surg, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Pediat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PROSTHESIS; MORTALITY; EVOLUTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.069
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Mitral valve anomalies in children are rare but frequently severe, recalcitrant, and not often amenable to primary repair, necessitating mechanical mitral valve replacement (M-MVR). This study examined outcomes of a cohort undergoing a first M-MVR at age younger than 21 years. Methods. We queried the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium, a multi-institutional United States-based cardiac intervention registry, for patients undergoing first M-MVR for 2-ventricle congenital heart disease. Survival and transplant status through 2014 were obtained from Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium and linkage with the National Death Index and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Results. We identified 441 patients (median age, 4.3 years; interquartile range, 1.3 to 10.1 years) meeting study criteria. The commonest disease necessitating M-MVR was atrioventricular canal (44.3%). Early mortality (death <90 days after M-MVR) was 11.1%; there was increased risk of early death if age at M-MVR was younger than 2 years (odds ratio, 7.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 56.6) and with concurrent other mechanical valve placement (odds ratio, 8.5; 95% CI, 2.0 to 35.6). In those surviving more than 90 days after M-MVR, transplant-free survival was 76% at 20 years of follow-up (median follow-up, 16.6 years; interquartile range, 11.9 to 21.3 years). Adjusted analysis in those who survived more than 90 days showed elevated risk of death/transplant for boys (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.3), age at M-MVR younger than 2 years (10-year survival: hazard ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 15.1), and nonbileaflet prosthesis placement (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.3). Conclusions. M-MVR is a viable strategy in children with unrepairable mitral valve disease. Age younger than 2 years at the first M-MVR is associated with significant early risk of death and poorer long-term survival. (C) 2019 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 150
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trends, clinical outcomes, and cost implications of mitral valve repair versus replacement, concomitant with aortic valve replacement
    Kilic, Arman
    Grimm, Joshua C.
    Magruder, J. Trent
    Sciortino, Christopher M.
    Whitman, Glenn J. R.
    Baumgartner, William A.
    Conte, John V.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 149 (06) : 1614 - 1619
  • [32] Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement: A Multicenter Study of Outcomes With Use of 15-to 17-mm Prostheses
    IJsselhof, Rinske J.
    Slieker, Martijn G.
    Gauvreau, Kimberlee
    Muter, Angelika
    Marx, Gerald R.
    Hazekamp, Mark G.
    Accord, Ryan
    van Wetten, Herbert
    van Leeuwen, Wouter
    Haas, Felix
    Schoof, Paul H.
    Nathan, Meena
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (06) : 2062 - 2069
  • [33] Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with mechanical or biological substitutes: a 20 years cohort
    Angela Henrique Silva Ribeiro
    Orlando Carlos Belmonte Wender
    Adriana Silveira de Almeida
    Luciana Eltz Soares
    Paulo Dornelles Picon
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 14
  • [34] Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with mechanical or biological substitutes: a 20 years cohort
    Silva Ribeiro, Angela Henrique
    Belmonte Wender, Orlando Carlos
    de Almeida, Adriana Silveira
    Soares, Luciana Eltz
    Picon, Paulo Dornelles
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2014, 14
  • [35] Comparison of Outcomes following Mitral Valve Repair versus Replacement for Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Meta-Analysis
    Yun-dan, Deng
    Wen-jing, Du
    Xi-jun, Xiao
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2017, 65 (06) : 432 - 441
  • [36] Trends in utilization, outcomes, and readmissions after transcatheter mitral valve replacement
    Elbadawi, Ayman
    Mahta, Dhruv
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Dang, Alexander T.
    Mahmoud, Mona
    Iskandar, Mina
    Kaple, Ryan
    Al-Azizi, Karim
    Szerlip, Molly
    Kayani, Waleed
    Barker, Colin M.
    Jneid, Hani
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 99 (03) : 906 - 914
  • [37] Outcomes of Different Mitral Valve Approaches Combined with Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Degenerative Valve Disease
    Jiang, Yiyao
    Cheng, Ming
    Zhang, Wei
    Peng, Xingxing
    Sun, Qijun
    Lv, Hang
    Li, Junquan
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2024, 27 (04) : E391 - E396
  • [38] Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement
    Hensey, Mark
    Brown, Richard A.
    Lal, Sudish
    Sathananthan, Janarthanan
    Ye, Jian
    Cheung, Anson
    Blanke, Philipp
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    Moss, Robert
    Boone, Robert
    Webb, John G.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (05) : 489 - 500
  • [39] Transcatheter mitral valve replacement
    Enta, Yusuke
    Nakamura, Mamoo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (06) : 555 - 564
  • [40] Early Outcomes After Mitral Valve Repair versus Replacement in the Elderly: A Propensity Matched Analysis
    Farid, Shakil
    Ladwiniec, Andrew
    Hernandez-Sanchez, Jules
    Povey, Hannah
    Caruana, Edward
    Ali, Ayyaz
    Moorjani, Narain
    Irons, Joanne
    Ring, Liam
    Abu-Omar, Yasir
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2019, 28 (02) : 314 - 319