Influence of local tumor control on distant metastases and cancer related mortality after external, beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer

被引:146
|
作者
Zelefsky, Michael J.
Reuter, Victor E.
Fuks, Zvi
Scardino, Peter
Shippy, Alison
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
prostate; biopsy; mortality; radiotherapy; neoplasm metastasis;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.063
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We report local control outcomes, as assessed by posttreatment biopsies in patients who underwent 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. In addition, we report the influence of local tumor control on long-term distant metastases and cause specific survival outcomes. Materials and Methods: Posttreatment prostate biopsies were performed in 339 patients who underwent 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The histological outcome of prostate biopsy was classified as positive-prostatic adenocarcinoma without typical radiation induced changes or negative-no evidence of carcinoma or severe treatment effect. Median followup in this group of 339 patients was 10 years after the completion of treatment and 6.25 years after posttreatment biopsy. Results: Overall biopsy outcomes in these patients were positive in 32%, severe treatment effect in 21% and negative in 47%. A higher radiation dose in the intermediate and high risk subgroups was associated with a lower incidence of positive biopsy. Of patients at intermediate risk who received a dose of 75.6 or greater 24% had a positive biopsy compared to 42% who received 70.2 Gy or less (p = 0.03). In the high risk group positive treatment biopsies were noted in 51% of patients who received 70.2 Gy or less, 33% of those who received 75.6 Gy and 15% of those who received 81 Gy or greater (70.2 or less vs 75.6 Gy p = 0.07 and 75.6 vs 81 Gy or greater p = 0.05). Short course neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy had a significant impact on the posttreatment biopsy outcome. Of patients who did not receive androgen deprivation therapy 42% had a positive biopsy compared to 16% who received androgen deprivation therapy (p < 0.0001). Patients with negative and severe treatment effect biopsies had similar 10-year prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival outcomes that were markedly different from outcomes in those with positive treatment biopsies. Multivariate analysis indicated that the strongest predictor of biochemical failure was posttreatment biopsy status (positive vs severe treatment effect or negative p < 0.001), followed by pretreatment prostate specific antigen (p = 0.05) and clinical T stage (p = 0.09). Similarly multivariate analysis revealed that a positive posttreatment biopsy was one of the strongest predictors of distant metastasis and prostate cancer death in this cohort of patients. Conclusions: As assessed by posttreatment prostate biopsies, local control is improved with higher radiation doses. Long-term biochemical outcomes in patients with posttreatment biopsies demonstrating severe treatment effect changes were not different than those in patients with negative biopsies. We also noted that local tumor control was associated with a decrease in distant metastases and prostate cancer mortality, further highlighting the importance of achieving optimal tumor control in patients with clinically localized disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1368 / 1373
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Local tumor control with salvage cryotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy
    Izawa, JI
    Perrotte, P
    Greene, GF
    Scott, S
    Levy, L
    McGuire, E
    Madsen, L
    von Eschenbach, AC
    Pisters, LL
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (03) : 867 - 870
  • [2] The relationship of increasing radiotherapy dose to reduced distant metastases and mortality in men with prostate cancer
    Jacob, R
    Hanlon, AL
    Horwitz, EM
    Movsas, B
    Uzzo, RG
    Pollack, A
    CANCER, 2004, 100 (03) : 538 - 543
  • [3] The role of salvage brachytherapy for local relapse after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Tisseverasinghe, Steven A.
    Crook, Juanita M.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (03) : 414 - 435
  • [4] External beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Pinkawa, M.
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2010, 52 (03) : 195 - 207
  • [5] External beam radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer
    Boehmer, D.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (11): : 1591 - 1600
  • [6] Smoking effect on secondary bladder cancer after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Shiota, Masaki
    Yokomizo, Akira
    Takeuchi, Ario
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Ohga, Saiji
    Sasaki, Tomonari
    Nakamura, Katsumasa
    Honda, Hiroshi
    Eto, Masatoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 46 (10) : 952 - 957
  • [7] Predictors of distant metastasis after combined HDR brachytherapy and external beam radiation for prostate cancer
    Kamrava, Mitchell
    Rwigema, Jean-Claude
    Chung, Melody
    Banerjee, Robyn
    Wang, Jason
    Steinberg, Michael
    Demanes, David Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 5 (03) : 127 - 133
  • [8] Second primary cancer after radiotherapy for prostate cancer - A SEER analysis of brachytherapy versus external beam radiotherapy
    Abdel-Wahab, May
    Reis, Isildinha M.
    Hamilton, Kara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : 58 - 68
  • [9] Salvage external beam radiotherapy for clinical failure after cryosurgery for prostate cancer
    McDonough, MJ
    Feldmeier, JJ
    Parsai, I
    Dobelbower, RR
    Selman, SH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (03): : 624 - 627
  • [10] External beam radiotherapy dose response of prostate cancer
    Pollack, A
    Zagars, GK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (05): : 1011 - 1018