A Comparison of Quantized Convolutional and LSTM Recurrent Neural Network Models Using MNIST

被引:10
作者
Kaziha, Omar [1 ]
Bonny, Talal [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Elect Engn Dept, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Sharjah, Comp Engn Dept, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
来源
2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS (ICECTA) | 2019年
关键词
Convolutional neural network; Long Short Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks; MNIST;
D O I
10.1109/icecta48151.2019.8959793
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper, a software comparative analysis of two neural network models is presented, namely, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) neural network. The evaluation is performed using the famous deep learning database the "MNIST" to check the accuracy, model size, speed and complexity of the two models for future digital realization on reconfigurable hardware. In addition to that, we optimize the size of the two models by quantizing the weights width to 8-bits instead of 32-bits. The results show an extensive reduction in the size of each model (by 10X) with a slight drop in the accuracy. The results also show that the CNN is more accurate and much faster than LSTMs making it the best model to be implemented on reconfigurable hardware.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Aani S.A., 2019, J DESALINATION
[2]  
Al-Saffar A.A.M., 2017, INT C RAD ANT MICR E
[3]   Deep learning for computational biology [J].
Angermueller, Christof ;
Parnamaa, Tanel ;
Parts, Leopold ;
Stegle, Oliver .
MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2016, 12 (07)
[4]  
Ciresan D.C., 2011, IJCAI 2011 P 22 INT
[5]  
Ciresan D, 2012, PROC CVPR IEEE, P3642, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248110
[6]  
DEN L, 2012, IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSI
[7]  
Donahue J, 2015, PROC CVPR IEEE, P2625, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298878
[8]  
ELKESSAB B, 2013, INT J ADV SCI TECHNO
[9]  
Graves A., 2013, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947
[10]  
Han S., 2017, ACM SIGDA INT S