Response of LiF-TLD micro-rods around 125I radioactive seed

被引:8
作者
Mobit, P
Badragan, I
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Harper Univ Hosp, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Phys, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Astron, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Dept Phys Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/48/19/003
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The EGSnrc Monte Carlo system has been used to calculate the energy response of LiF-TLDs of different sizes around I-125 permanent brachytherapy sources. The source model includes the effects of an encapsulation, self-absorption within the source and in the welded ends of the encapsulation. The LiF-TLD material has cylindrical geometry (micro-rod) with diameters ranging from I mm to 5 mm and a length of 6 mm. The energy response factor (relative to Co-60 gamma-rays) for a LiF-TLD calibrated in Co-60 gamma-rays and then irradiated by an 1251 permanent brachytherapy source varies between 1.32 +/- 0.2% (1 SD) and 1.406 +/- 0.2% (1 SD) for 5 mm and 1 mm diameter micro-rods, respectively. The energy response factor depends on the radius and the polar angle (r, theta) of the measurement point. For a LiF-TLD of diameter 1 mm calibrated at 1 cm on the transverse axis (r = 1.0 cm, theta = 90degrees) of the I-125 source in water, the energy response factor decreases by a maximum of 3.5% within the 6 cm x 6 cm x 6 cm calculation region. For the 5 mm diameter LiF-TLD, the energy response factor decreases by a maximum of 5% in the same region. An examination of the photon energy spectra showed that the photon spectrum does not change significantly in water within the 3D calculation region (6 cm x 6 cm x 6 cm). The mass energy absorption coefficient ratio of water to LiF-TLDs does not vary by more than 0.5% in this calculation grid. The results, however, show that there is a change in the photon spectrum with distance from the source and with polar angle for LiF-TLDs. This difference in the energy spectrum gives rise to a difference in the mass energy absorption coefficient ratio of water to LiF (calculated by taking into account the difference in photon fluence in water and LiF) and that calculated assuming that the photon spectrum in water and in the LiF-TLD is identical.
引用
收藏
页码:3129 / 3142
页数:14
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   DOSE-RATE DETERMINATION FOR I-125 SEEDS [J].
CHIUTSAO, ST ;
ANDERSON, LL ;
OBRIEN, K ;
SANNA, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (05) :815-825
[2]   THE 3-DIMENSIONAL DOSE DISTRIBUTION OF I-125 SEEDS IN TISSUE [J].
HARTMANN, GH ;
SCHLEGEL, W ;
SCHARFENBERG, H .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1983, 28 (06) :693-699
[3]  
HOBEILA F, 1996, IAEACN9617
[4]   Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version [J].
Kawrakow, I .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) :485-498
[5]   A COMPARISON OF SOLID PHANTOMS WITH WATER FOR DOSIMETRY OF I125 BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES [J].
MEIGOONI, AS ;
MELI, JA ;
NATH, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (05) :695-701
[6]   The quality dependence of LiF TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments [J].
Mobit, PN ;
Mayles, P ;
Nahum, AE .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (03) :387-398
[7]   A Monte Carlo study of the quality dependence factors of common TLD materials in photon and electron beams [J].
Mobit, PN ;
Nahum, AE ;
Mayles, P .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (08) :2015-2032
[8]  
MOBIT PN, 2003, UNPUB MED PHYS
[9]   DOSIMETRY OF INTERSTITIAL BRACHYTHERAPY SOURCES - RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK GROUP NO 43 [J].
NATH, R ;
ANDERSON, LL ;
LUXTON, G ;
WEAVER, KA ;
WILLIAMSON, JF ;
MEIGOONI, AS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (02) :209-234
[10]   ENERGY-DEPENDENCE OF THE RESPONSE OF THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETERS TO PHOTON AND ELECTRON-BEAMS [J].
OLIVERA, GH ;
KESSLER, C ;
SANSOGNE, RA ;
SARAVI, M .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 1994, 84 (01) :89-94