Making students talk about expository texts

被引:1
作者
Reichenberg, Monica [1 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Dept Educ, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
poor readers; reading comprehension; reading strategies; structured text talk;
D O I
10.1080/00313830701786586
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study presents a comparison between how six teachers and their 17-year-old students talked about texts in civics and nursing science during regular lessons and during two lessons where structured text talk in smaller groups was used. The majority of students were poor readers and attended vocational programmes. The text talks were videotaped. During the regular lessons, most of the teachers asked purely factual questions where the students just had to retrieve information from the text to be able to answer them. The students made few inferences and reflections. After the regular lessons, the teachers were invited to participate in seminars led by the investigator. In these seminars, a special model of structured text talk was practiced before videotaping a second and a third time. The results demonstrate that during the structured text talks the teachers' question types had undergone a change. The number of purely factual questions had decreased. Instead there was an increase in the number of inferences and half-open questions. The students read more actively during the structured text talks. They clearly made an effort to explore ideas in the text and made numerous inferences and reflections.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 39
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Effect of Texts about Turkish and American Cultures on Reading Comprehension Level of Primary School Students
    Bas, Ozlem
    HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2013, 28 (03): : 30 - 40
  • [32] Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Virginia Clinton
    Terrill Taylor
    Surjya Bajpayee
    Mark L. Davison
    Sarah E. Carlson
    Ben Seipel
    Reading and Writing, 2020, 33 : 2223 - 2248
  • [33] Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Clinton, Virginia
    Taylor, Terrill
    Bajpayee, Surjya
    Davison, Mark L.
    Carlson, Sarah E.
    Seipel, Ben
    READING AND WRITING, 2020, 33 (09) : 2223 - 2248
  • [34] Increasing Comprehension of Expository Science Text for Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Carnahan, Christina R.
    Williamson, Pamela
    Birri, Nicole
    Swoboda, Christopher
    Snyder, Kate K.
    FOCUS ON AUTISM AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2016, 31 (03) : 208 - 220
  • [35] A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts
    Ivar Bråten
    Helge I. Strømsø
    Reading and Writing, 2003, 16 (3) : 195 - 218
  • [36] Learning From Refutation and Standard Expository Science Texts: The Contribution of Inhibitory Functions in Relation to Text Type
    Mason, Lucia
    Borella, Erika
    Diakidoy, Irene-Anna N.
    Butterfuss, Reese
    Kendeou, Panayiota
    Carretti, Barbara
    DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2020, 57 (10) : 921 - 939
  • [37] Reading Comprehension of Expository Texts in School-Aged Children according to Text Structure and Question Type
    Park, Minhae
    Jung, Kyung Hee
    COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2018, 23 (01): : 83 - 93
  • [38] Leveraging What Students Know to Make Sense of Texts: What the Research Says About Prior Knowledge Activation
    Hattan, Courtney
    Alexander, Patricia A.
    Lupo, Sarah M.
    REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 94 (01) : 73 - 111
  • [39] Learning from expository texts: Effects of the interaction of prior knowledge and text structure on responses to different question types
    Françoise Armand
    European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2001, 16 : 67 - 86
  • [40] Predicting reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts among Hebrew-speaking readers with and without a reading disability
    Liron Primor
    Margaret E. Pierce
    Tami Katzir
    Annals of Dyslexia, 2011, 61 : 242 - 268