Institutional frameworks for human dimensions: reflections for marine protected areas in Brazil

被引:2
作者
Barreto, Giovanna Carla [1 ,3 ]
Silva, Manuela Dreyer da [1 ]
Nascimento, Decio Estevao do [2 ]
Serafini, Thiago Zagonel [2 ]
Medeiros, Rodrigo Pereira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana Curitiba, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
[2] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Parana, Programa Pos Grad Meio Ambiente & Desenvolvimento, Rua Funcionarios,1540 Cabral, BR-82590300 Curitiba, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS AMBIENTAIS | 2022年 / 57卷 / 01期
关键词
components of human dimensions; institutional framework; natural resource management; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; SMALL-SCALE; TARGET; 11; CONSERVATION; GOVERNANCE; POLICY;
D O I
10.5327/Z217694781027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Human Dimensions (HDs) have appeared in the scientific literature linked to the application of alternative approaches to natural resource management. National and international institutions (policies, guidelines, and global goals) guided these discussions on Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). The study aimed at relating these frameworks to the components of HDs. In this sense, a literature review was carried out based on criteria established by Barreto et al. (2020), guiding the selection of 92 peer-reviewed articles complemented by documents related to institutional frameworks. The analysis linked the institutional aspects selected to the components of HDs outlined in the literature. The research revealed the theory of the commons as an influencer in creating the concept of HDs, showing that its understanding goes beyond the univocal idea of human dimensions as the control and regulation of human behavior. Furthermore, five challenges for the integration of HDs in management approaches are highlighted from the connection between the institutional frameworks and the components of HDs. There are signs of a management model in transition that considers and emphasizes human dimensions; however, technocratic and centralizing approaches still prevail.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 47
页数:14
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]   Panarchy: Theory and Application [J].
Allen, Craig R. ;
Angeler, David G. ;
Garmestani, Ahjond S. ;
Gunderson, Lance H. ;
Holling, C. S. .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2014, 17 (04) :578-589
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Aplicacao pratica da abordagem ecossistemica as pescas
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentavel
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, COD COND RESP FISH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Declaracao do Rio
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Brundtland Report
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1989, INDIGENOUS TRIBAL PE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Constituicao da Republica Federativa do Brasil
[9]   Governance principles for community-centered conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework [J].
Armitage, Derek ;
Mbatha, Philile ;
Muhl, Ella-Kari ;
Rice, Wayne ;
Sowman, Merle .
CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (02)
[10]   Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity [J].
Armitage, Derek R. ;
Plummer, Ryan ;
Berkes, Fikret ;
Arthur, Robert I. ;
Charles, Anthony T. ;
Davidson-Hunt, Iain J. ;
Diduck, Alan P. ;
Doubleday, Nancy C. ;
Johnson, Derek S. ;
Marschke, Melissa ;
McConney, Patrick ;
Pinkerton, Evelyn W. ;
Wollenberg, Eva K. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (02) :95-102