Capsule endoscopy for the detection of oesophageal mucosal disorders: a comparison of two different ingestion protocols

被引:14
作者
De Jonge, Pieter J. F. [1 ]
Van Eijck, Brechje C. [1 ]
Geldof, Han
Bekkering, Frank C.
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise [2 ]
Polinder, Suzanne [2 ]
Kuipers, Ernst J. [1 ,3 ]
Siersema, Peter D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Internal Med, NL-3015 CE Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
capsule endoscopy; gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; oesophageal disorders; screening;
D O I
10.1080/00365520801908878
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To assess the accuracy of a new ingestion protocol for capsule endoscopy (CE) in evaluating patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Methods. Oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy (OGD) was performed 1 week prior to CE. The first 28 subjects swallowed the capsule following the original ingestion protocol (OIP) and the subsequent 30 subjects following a simplified ingestion protocol (SIP). CE videos were reviewed by two independent investigators who were blinded to the OGD findings. Results. Of 48 patients included, 24 were diagnosed with reflux oesophagitis (67% male, mean age 49.5 +/- 13 years) and 24 with Barrett oesophagus (BO) (88% male, 55.6 +/- 10 years) by OGD. In addition, 10 asymptomatic healthy controls (50% male, 45.8 +/- 7.1 years) were included. Oesophageal transit time was faster in patients using the SIP compared to the OIP (126 +/- 26 s versus 214 +/- 33; p=0.04). Complete evaluation of the Z-line was possible in 19/28 (68%) of the OIPs compared to 28/30 (93%) of the SIPs (p=0.04). Sensitivity for detecting any oesophageal abnormality was higher in the SIP group than in the OIP group (97% versus 89%; p=0.11). Overall, CE detected oesophagitis in 22/24 patients (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 88%) and BO in 23/24 patients (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 91%). Furthermore, 41/44 (93%) preferred CE over OGD and experienced less discomfort and pain during CE. Conclusion. CE is an accurate method for detecting mucosal oesophageal abnormalities. The new ingestion protocol improves the visualization of the Z-line, which is likely to increase the diagnostic yield of CE.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 877
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Barrett's oesophagus - A review of costs of the illness [J].
Arguedas, MR ;
Eloubeidi, MA .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (10) :1003-1011
[2]   The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: A progress report on observer agreement [J].
Armstrong, D ;
Bennett, JR ;
Blum, AL ;
Dent, J ;
deDombal, FT ;
Galmiche, JP ;
Lundell, L ;
Margulies, M ;
Richter, JE ;
Spechler, SJ ;
Tytgat, GNJ ;
Wallin, L .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 111 (01) :85-92
[3]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[4]   Epidemiology of gastrooesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review [J].
Dent, J ;
El-Serag, HB ;
Wallander, MA ;
Johansson, S .
GUT, 2005, 54 (05) :710-717
[5]   Complications of upper GI endoscopy [J].
Eisen, GM ;
Baron, TH ;
Dominitz, JA ;
Faigel, DO ;
Goldstein, JL ;
Johanson, JF ;
Mallery, JS ;
Raddawi, HM ;
Vargo, JJ ;
Waring, JP ;
Fanelli, RD ;
Wheeler-Harbough, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (07) :784-793
[6]   A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of PillCam ESO esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux diseases [J].
Eliakim, R ;
Sharma, VK ;
Yassin, K ;
Adler, SN ;
Jacob, H ;
Cave, DR ;
Sachdev, R ;
Mitty, RD ;
Hartmann, D ;
Schilling, D ;
Riemann, JF ;
Bar-Meir, S ;
Bardan, E ;
Fennerty, B ;
Eisen, G ;
Faigel, D ;
Lewis, BS ;
Fleischer, DE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 39 (07) :572-578
[7]   A novel diagnostic tool for detecting oesophageal pathology: the PillCam oesophageal video capsule [J].
Eliakim, R ;
Yassin, K ;
Shlomi, I ;
Suissa, A ;
Eisen, GM .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 20 (10) :1083-1089
[8]   Cost-benefit analysis of capsule endoscopy compared with standard upper endoscopy for the detection of Barrett's esophagus [J].
Gerson, Lauren ;
Lin, Otto S. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 5 (03) :319-325
[9]   A simplified ingestion procedure for esophageal capsule endoscopy: initial evaluation in healthy volunteers [J].
Gralnek, I. M. ;
Rabinovitz, R. ;
Afik, D. ;
Eliakim, R. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (09) :913-918
[10]   Office-based unsedated small-caliber endoscopy is equivalent to conventional sedated endoscopy in screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: A randomized and blinded comparison [J].
Jobe, Blair A. ;
Hunter, John G. ;
Chang, Eugene Y. ;
Kim, Charles Y. ;
Eisen, Glenn M. ;
Robinson, Jedediah D. ;
Diggs, Brian S. ;
O'Rourke, Robert W. ;
Rader, Anne E. ;
Schipper, Paul ;
Sauer, David A. ;
Peters, Jeffrey H. ;
Lieberman, David A. ;
Morris, Cynthia D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (12) :2693-2703