Auditory Nerve Recovery Function in Cochlear Implant Surgery with Local Anesthesia and Sedation versus General Anesthesia

被引：9

作者：

Minhoto Wiemes, Gislaine Richter ^{[1
]}

Hamerschmidt, Rogerio ^{[1
]}

Ramos Moreira, Ana Tereza ^{[1
]}

de Fraga, Rogerio ^{[1
]}

Tenorio, Sergio Bernardo ^{[1
]}

Carvalho, Bettina ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Fed Univ Parana UFPR, Surg Clin, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

[2] Fed Univ Parana UFPR, Children & Adolescent Hlth, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

来源：

AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY | 2016年 / 21卷 / 03期

关键词：

Cochlear implant; Telemetry; Auditory nerve recovery function; Anesthesia; NEURAL RESPONSE TELEMETRY; COMPOUND ACTION-POTENTIALS; REFRACTORINESS; CHILDREN;

D O I：

10.1159/000445098

中图分类号：

R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];

学科分类号：

100104 ; 100213 ;

摘要：

Objective: To analyze auditory nerve recovery function (REC), comparing the results after local anesthesia and sedation with those after general anesthesia. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional and descriptive study in a tertiary referral center hospital. We included all patients (37 ears) who underwent surgery for cochlear implant under either general anesthesia or local anesthesia and sedation during 3 years. REC was measured according to the function of 3 components, 'To', 'A' and 'tau', and was taken for 3 cochlear electrodes (apical, medial and basal). Results: There were no significant differences in 'tau' and in the current level used, but there were significant differences in the parameters 'To' apical and 'A' basal. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in REC between the 2 types of anesthesia, except for the parameters 'To' apical and 'A' basal. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel

引用

页码：150 / 157

页数：8

共 19 条

[1] Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential [J].

Abbas, PJ ;

Brown, CJ ;

Shallop, JK ;

Firszt, JB ;

Hughes, ML ;

Hong, SH ;

Staller, SJ .

EAR AND HEARING, 1999, 20 (01) :45-59

[2] Electrically evoked compound action potentials recorded from subjects who use the nucleus CI24M device [J].

Abbas, PJ ;

Brown, CJ ;

Hughes, ML ;

Gantz, BJ ;

Wolaver, AA ;

Gervais, JP ;

Hong, SH .

ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 109 (12) :6-9

[3]

Battmer RD, 2004, INT J AUDIOL, V43, pS10

[4]

Bevilacqua MC, 2003, TRATADO OTORRINOLARI, P268

[5] AutoNRT™:: An automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus® Freedom™ cochlear implant via machine intelligence [J].

Botros, Andrew ;

van Dijk, Bas ;

Killian, Matthijs .

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 40 (01) :15-28

[6] Neural Response Telemetry Reconsidered: II. The Influence of Neural Population on the ECAP Recovery Function and Refractoriness [J].

Botros, Andrew ;

Psarros, Colleen .

EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (03) :380-391

[7] Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry and Neural Recovery Function: a Comparative Study between Adults and Children [J].

Carvalho, Bettina ;

Hamerschmidt, Rogerio ;

Wiemes, Gislaine .

INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 19 (01) :10-15

[8] Dose-Dependent Suppression of the Electrically Elicited Stapedius Reflex by General Anesthetics in Children Undergoing Cochlear Implant Surgery [J].

Crawford, Mark W. ;

White, Michelle C. ;

Propst, Evan J. ;

Zaarour, Christian ;

Cushing, Sharon ;

Pehora, Carolyne ;

James, Adrian L. ;

Gordon, Karen A. ;

Papsin, Blake C. .

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (05) :1480-1487

[9] Cochlear implants and brain plasticity [J].

Fallon, James B. ;

Irvine, Dexter R. F. ;

Shepherd, Robert K. .

HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 238 (1-2) :110-117

[10]

Ferrari Deborah V., 2004, Rev. Bras. Otorrinolaringol., V70, P112, DOI 10.1590/S0034-72992004000100019

← 1 2 →