Industrial Policy, Information, and Government Capacity

被引:11
|
作者
Maloney, William F. [1 ]
Nayyar, Gaurav [2 ]
机构
[1] World Bank Grp, Equitable Growth Finance & Inst Practice Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] World Bank Grp, Finance Competitiveness & Innovat Global Practice, Washington, DC USA
关键词
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; SOPHISTICATION; CLUSTERS; BUSINESS; ROADMAPS; QUALITY; TRADE;
D O I
10.1093/wbro/lkx006
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Governments are resource- and bandwidth-constrained, and hence need to prioritize productivity-enhancing policies. To do so requires information on the nature and magnitude of market failures on the one hand, and government's capacity to redress them successfully on the other. This article reviews perspectives on vertical (sectoral) and horizontal (factor markets, cluster) policies with a view to both criteria. We first argue that the case for either vertical or horizontal policies cannot be made on the basis of the likelihood of successful implementation: for instance, educational policies and "picking the winner" types of policies both run the risks of capture and incompetent execution. However, the economics profession has been able to establish more convincing market failures for horizontal policies than for vertical policies. Most of the recent approaches to identifying failures around particular goods are of limited help. Hence, for a given difficulty of execution, the former are generally preferred. A second critical message is that improving the quality of governance in terms of collecting information, coordination ability, and defending against capture is critical to the successful implementation of productivity policies and should be central on the policy agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 217
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Government's green grip: Does industrial policy improve firm environmental performance?
    Bu, Wenchao
    Ren, Siyu
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2023, 44 (06) : 3026 - 3042
  • [2] The government capacity on industrial pollution management in Shanxi province: A response impulse analysis
    Zhang, Lin
    An, Yao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 223 : 1037 - 1046
  • [3] Agglomeration, clusters, and industrial policy
    Nathan, Max
    Overman, Henry
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2013, 29 (02) : 383 - 404
  • [4] STRATEGIZING BY THE GOVERNMENT: CAN INDUSTRIAL POLICY CREATE FIRM-LEVEL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE?
    Lazzarini, Sergio G.
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (01) : 97 - 112
  • [5] Latecomer Economies and National Digital Policy: An Industrial Policy Perspective
    Foster, Christopher
    Azmeh, Shamel
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2019, : 1247 - 1262
  • [6] Industrial policy and potential for export upgrading: Evidence from government-approved projects in China
    Ding, Yibing
    Zhuang, Yuhang
    Zhang, Liyunpeng
    Yang, Gongyan
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2024, 133
  • [7] Clusters and comparative advantage:: Implications for industrial policy
    Rodriguez-Clare, Andres
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2007, 82 (01) : 43 - 57
  • [8] Industrial subsidy policy and the optimal level of specialization
    Dubey, Ram Sewak
    Kang, Minwook
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 91 : 81 - 88
  • [9] Approach to Information Support and Ensure the Implementation of PR-activities of the State Industrial Policy
    Plotnikov, Vladimir
    Rodina, Valeria
    VISION 2020: INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY, AND COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2016, VOLS I - VII, 2016, : 1124 - 1132
  • [10] Industrial Policy and Competition
    Aghion, Philippe
    Cai, Jing
    Dewatripont, Mathias
    Du, Luosha
    Harrison, Ann
    Legros, Patrick
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2015, 7 (04) : 1 - 32