A protocol for an updated and expanded systematic mixed studies review of fear of cancer recurrence in families and caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer

被引:6
作者
Leske, Stuart [1 ]
Ben Smith, Allan [1 ,2 ]
Lambert, Sylvie D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Girgis, Afaf [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Ctr Oncol Educ & Res Translat CONCERT, Psychooncol Res Grp, Liverpool, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clin Sch, Liverpool, Australia
[3] McGill Univ, Ingram Sch Nursing, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] St Marys Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Systematic review; Fear of cancer recurrence; Anxiety; Concern; Worry; Recurrence; Progression; Caregivers; Families; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ASSESSING RISK; TOOL; RELIABILITY; SURVIVORS; BIAS; EFFICIENCY; COCHRANE; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-018-0795-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is reportedly common, persistent, associated with significant morbidity and often higher in cancer caregivers than cancer patients. This review will summarise empirical research on FCR to understand its prevalence, severity, correlates, course and impact in families and caregivers of adults diagnosed with cancer, and identify tested interventions that reduce its effects. Methods: This review will include peer-reviewed, empirical, qualitative and/or quantitative studies on fear, worry or concern of patients' cancer returning or progressing among adult family members or caregivers of the cancer patient. It will exclude records reporting no original empirical research on FCR. We will search CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses GLOBAL from 1997 onwards. Pairs of reviewers will conduct independent screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised studies, the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Nonrandomized Studies and the questions for qualitative studies in the mixed methods appraisal tool. We will conduct a narrative synthesis of quantitative studies and a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Discussion: This review will provide further clarity on the prevalence and severity of FCR in families and caregivers and differences by caregiver and care recipient demographic and medical characteristics. Any intervention studies located may indicate therapies or treatments that could reduce FCR in families and caregivers. Findings are expected to provide guidance for individuals and organisations working to manage FCR in families and caregivers of those with cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [11] Covidence systematic review software, VER HLTH INN
  • [12] Inadequate reporting of controlled trials as short reports
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1998, 352 (9144) : 1908 - 1908
  • [13] When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist
    Garner, Paul
    Hopewell, Sally
    Chandler, Jackie
    MacLehose, Harriet
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Akl, Elie A.
    Beyene, Joseph
    Chang, Stephanie
    Churchill, Rachel
    Dearness, Karin
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Lefebvre, Carol
    Liles, Beth
    Marshall, Rachel
    Martinez Garcia, Laura
    Mavergames, Chris
    Nasser, Mona
    Qaseem, Amir
    Sampson, Margaret
    Soares-Weiser, Karla
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Thabane, Lehana
    Trivella, Marialena
    Tugwell, Peter
    Welsh, Emma
    Wilson, Ed C.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 354
  • [14] Gough D., 2007, RES PAP EDUC, V22, P213, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02671520701296189, https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189]
  • [15] Higgins JP, 2022, Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial
  • [16] Higgins JP., 2011, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V343, P5928, DOI [10.1136/bmj.d5928, DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D5928]
  • [17] Fear of recurrence and psychological distress in head and neck cancer patients and their carers
    Hodges, Laura J.
    Humphris, Gerry M.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (08) : 841 - 848
  • [18] Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: Overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
    Jørgensen L.
    Paludan-Müller A.S.
    Laursen D.R.T.
    Savović J.
    Boutron I.
    Sterne J.A.C.
    Higgins J.P.T.
    Hróbjartsson A.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [19] Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity
    Kim, Soo Young
    Park, Ji Eun
    Lee, Yoon Jae
    Seo, Hyun-Ju
    Sheen, Seung-Soo
    Hahn, Seokyung
    Jang, Bo-Hyoung
    Son, Hee-Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (04) : 408 - 414
  • [20] Fear of recurrence and disease progression in long-term (≥5 years) cancer survivors-a systematic review of quantitative studies
    Koch, L.
    Jansen, L.
    Brenner, H.
    Arndt, V.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 (01) : 1 - 11