Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption?

被引:197
作者
Laepple, Doris [1 ,2 ]
Van Rensburg, Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] TEAGASC, Rural Econ & Dev Programme, Athenry, Co Galway, Ireland
[2] Natl Univ Ireland, Dept Econ, Galway, Ireland
关键词
Organic farming; Early and late adoption; Multinomial logic analysis; Farmer attitudes; ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION SCHEME; INFORMATION; DIFFUSION; FARMERS; MODELS; TECHNOLOGIES; AGRICULTURE; ACQUISITION; TILLAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Based on the fact that not all farmers adopt a technology at the same time, it is argued in this paper that the distinction between groups is important because early, medium and late adopters respond differently to economic and non-economic factors when they consider whether to take up organic farming or not. The individual effects on adoption between the groups are identified by the use of multinomial logit analysis. The results provide evidence that there are significant differences in the characteristics between the adopter groups. The findings also reveal that the factors that affect adoption play a different role for early, medium and late adopters, particularly with regard to farming intensity, age, information gathering as well as attitudes of the farmer. More specifically, early adopters were the youngest to adopt organic farming and their decisions were found to be less profit related compared to other groups. Late adoption is constrained by risk considerations, while environmental attitudes and social learning were identified to be important determinants for all adopter groups. Overall, the findings strongly suggest, that for policy measures to be effective, the current state of diffusion has to be taken into account. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1406 / 1414
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
AMEMIYA T, 1981, J ECON LIT, V19, P1483
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, EC PERFORMANCE ORGAN
[4]   The dynamics of agricultural biotechnology adoption: Lessons from rBST use in Wisconsin, 1994-2001 [J].
Barham, BL ;
Foltz, JD ;
Jackson-Smith, D ;
Moon, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 86 (01) :61-72
[5]   Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England [J].
Battershill, MRJ ;
Gilg, AW .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1997, 13 (02) :213-228
[6]   Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' conservation behaviour [J].
Beedell, J ;
Rehman, T .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2000, 16 (01) :117-127
[7]   Organic agriculture and the conventionalization hypothesis: A case study from West Germany [J].
Best, Henning .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2008, 25 (01) :95-106
[8]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION - A REVIEW [J].
BIRKHAEUSER, D ;
EVENSON, RE ;
FEDER, G .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 1991, 39 (03) :607-650
[9]  
BLEASDALE A, 1995, IRISH GRASSLANDS THE, P110
[10]  
Bromley D. W., 1990, European Review of Agricultural Economics, V17, P197, DOI 10.1093/erae/17.2.197