A bootstrap method for uncertainty estimation in quality correlation algorithm for risk based tolerance synthesis

被引:1
作者
Batbooti, Raed S. [1 ]
Ransing, R. S. [1 ]
Ransing, M. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Coll Engn, Swansea SA1 8EN, W Glam, Wales
[2] P Matrix Ltd, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
7Epsilon; Six Sigma; No-Fault-Found product failures; Bootstrapping; In-tolerance faults and in-process quality improvement; CO-LINEARITY INDEX; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENTS; STOPPING RULES; LOADINGS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2016.09.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A risk based tolerance synthesis approach is based on 1509001:2015 quality standard's risk based thinking. It analyses in-process data to discover correlations among regions of input data scatter and desired or undesired process outputs. Recently, Ransing, Batbooti, Giannetti, and Ransing (2016) proposed a quality correlation algorithm (QCA) for risk based tolerance synthesis. The quality correlation algorithm is based on the principal component analysis (PCA) and a co-linearity index concept (Ransing, Giannetti, Ransing, & James, 2013). The uncertainty in QCA results on mixed data sets is quantified and analysed in this paper. The uncertainty is quantified using a bootstrap sampling method with bias-corrected and accelerated confidence intervals. The co-linearity indices use the length and cosine angles of loading vectors in a p-dimensional space. The uncertainty for all p-loading vectors is shown in a single co-linearity index plot and is used to quantify the uncertainty in predicting optimal tolerance limits. The effects of re-sampling distributions are analysed. The QCA tolerance limits are revised after estimating the uncertainty in limits via bootstrap sampling. The proposed approach has been demonstrated by analysing in-process data from a previously published case study. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 662
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Statistics: A Journal of Theoretical Applied Statistics, DOI DOI 10.1080/02331888808802095
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INCREMENTAL CALCULAT
[4]   Bootstrap based confidence limits in principal component analysis - A case study [J].
Babamoradi, Hamid ;
van den Berg, Frans ;
Rinnan, Asmund .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2013, 120 :97-105
[5]  
Batbooti R. S, 2015, CIE45 P 28 30 OCT 20, P1143
[6]   PCA STABILITY AND CHOICE OF DIMENSIONALITY [J].
BESSE, P .
STATISTICS & PROBABILITY LETTERS, 1992, 13 (05) :405-410
[8]   Process-oriented tolerancing for multi-station assembly systems [J].
Ding, Y ;
Jin, JH ;
Ceglarek, D ;
Shi, JJ .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2005, 37 (06) :493-508
[9]  
EFRON B, 1987, J AM STAT ASSOC, V82, P171, DOI 10.2307/2289144
[10]   1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE [J].
EFRON, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) :1-26