Effect of the combined aerodynamic control on the amplitude characteristics of wind loads on a tall building

被引:7
作者
Zheng, Chaorong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhaoyong [2 ]
Zhang, Jitong [2 ]
Wu, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Zhao [3 ]
Chen, Yong [3 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Minist Educ, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[3] China Northeast Architectural Design & Res Inst C, Shenyang 110006, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Tall building; Wind load; Wind tunnel test; Combined aerodynamic control; Shape modification; Air suction; DOUBLE-SKIN FACADE; INDUCED RESPONSES; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; INDUCED VIBRATION; MASS DAMPERS; SET-BACK; PERFORMANCE; ACCELERATIONS; SUPPRESSION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112967
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Experimental investigation of the amplitude characteristics of wind loads on a square cross-sectional tall building under the combined aerodynamic control, which consists of the shape modification and air suction, has been conducted, and the effects of the suction flux coefficients CQ and wind direction angles on the wind pressure coefficients and aerodynamic force coefficients of five test models (includes a square cylinder and its corner modifications such as recession and chamfer, tapered cylinder and Y-shaped cylinder, and they are denoted as the Models 1-5 respectively) with and without air suction control have been analyzed. The Model 1 without suction control is defined as the benchmark model. The results show that the shape modifications have significant control effects on the mean and RMS pressure drag coefficients (CD and C Sigma D) as well as the RMS pressure lift coefficient C Sigma L of the Models 2, 3 and 5 at 0 degrees wind direction, with the maximum reduction rates (CDR, C Sigma DR and C Sigma LR) of 39.2%, 44.0% and 38.4% for the Models 2, 5 and 2 respectively. When compared with the benchmark model, the most significant control effects of the combined aerodynamic control on CDR, C Sigma D and C Sigma L of the Models 2-5 with the suction speed of 9 m/s are also at 0 degrees wind direction, with the maximum reduction rates of 61.8%, 65.8% and 5.7% for the Models 2, 2 and 5 respectively, which indicates that the combined aerodynamic control is more effective on the drag reduction than the passive or active aerodynamic control individually, and the Model 2 with suction control has the best wind-resistant performance. This study contributes to an effective aerodynamic measure to control the amplitude characteristics of wind loads on tall buildings, which can be an important reference for further studies or potential engineering applications of the combined aerodynamic control in mitigating the wind loads and wind-induced responses of tall buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of along-wind loading on tall building based on two-dimensional aerodynamic admittance
    Wang, Yuxia
    Li, Mingshui
    Yang, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2023, 238
  • [32] Aerodynamic mitigation of wind loads on a large-span cantilevered roof: A combined wind tunnel and CFD analysis
    Chen, Fubin
    Wang, Weijia
    Yang, Danqing
    Shu, Zhenru
    [J]. WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2024, 38 (03) : 203 - 214
  • [33] An efficient optimization approach for wind interference effect on octagonal tall building
    Kar, Rony
    Dalui, Sujit Kumar
    Bhattacharjya, Soumya
    [J]. WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 28 (02) : 111 - 128
  • [34] Effect of Turbulence Intensity on Aerodynamic Loads of Floating Wind Turbine under Wind-Wave Coupling Effect
    Tian, Wenxin
    Shi, Qiang
    Zhang, Lidong
    Ren, Hehe
    Yu, Hongfa
    Chen, Yibing
    Feng, Zhengcong
    Bai, Yuan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [35] Effect of combined-type wind barriers on the aerodynamic characteristics of axle systems under crosswinds action
    横风作用下旋叶型风屏障对车桥系统的气动特性影响研究
    [J]. 2025, 44 (02): : 177 - 186and220
  • [36] Wind effect and aerodynamic wind resistance measures of a 257 m high apartment building
    Wu J.
    Shi B.
    Xie Z.
    [J]. Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43 (10): : 111 - 118
  • [37] Dynamic Response Control of a Wind-Excited Tall Building with Distributed Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers
    Elias, Said
    Matsagar, Vasant
    Datta, T. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL STABILITY AND DYNAMICS, 2019, 19 (06)
  • [38] Wind Tunnel Test Research on the Effect of Rough Strips on Wind Loads of A Super High-Rise Building
    Yang Y.
    Wang X.
    Ji C.
    [J]. Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2023, 51 (04): : 1 - 8
  • [39] Study on wind aerodynamic and flow characteristics of triangular-shaped tall buildings and CFD simulation in order to assess drag coefficient
    Daemei, Abdollah Baghaei
    Khotbehsara, Elham Mehrinejad
    Nobarani, Erfan Malekian
    Bahrami, Payam
    [J]. AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2019, 10 (03) : 541 - 548
  • [40] Cyber-physical aerodynamic shape optimization of a tall building in a wind tunnel using an active fin system
    Whiteman, Michael L.
    Fernandez-Caban, Pedro L.
    Phillips, Brian M.
    Masters, Forrest J.
    Davis, Justin R.
    Bridge, Jennifer A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2022, 220