Effect of the combined aerodynamic control on the amplitude characteristics of wind loads on a tall building

被引:6
|
作者
Zheng, Chaorong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhaoyong [2 ]
Zhang, Jitong [2 ]
Wu, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Zhao [3 ]
Chen, Yong [3 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Minist Educ, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
[3] China Northeast Architectural Design & Res Inst C, Shenyang 110006, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Tall building; Wind load; Wind tunnel test; Combined aerodynamic control; Shape modification; Air suction; DOUBLE-SKIN FACADE; INDUCED RESPONSES; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; INDUCED VIBRATION; MASS DAMPERS; SET-BACK; PERFORMANCE; ACCELERATIONS; SUPPRESSION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112967
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Experimental investigation of the amplitude characteristics of wind loads on a square cross-sectional tall building under the combined aerodynamic control, which consists of the shape modification and air suction, has been conducted, and the effects of the suction flux coefficients CQ and wind direction angles on the wind pressure coefficients and aerodynamic force coefficients of five test models (includes a square cylinder and its corner modifications such as recession and chamfer, tapered cylinder and Y-shaped cylinder, and they are denoted as the Models 1-5 respectively) with and without air suction control have been analyzed. The Model 1 without suction control is defined as the benchmark model. The results show that the shape modifications have significant control effects on the mean and RMS pressure drag coefficients (CD and C Sigma D) as well as the RMS pressure lift coefficient C Sigma L of the Models 2, 3 and 5 at 0 degrees wind direction, with the maximum reduction rates (CDR, C Sigma DR and C Sigma LR) of 39.2%, 44.0% and 38.4% for the Models 2, 5 and 2 respectively. When compared with the benchmark model, the most significant control effects of the combined aerodynamic control on CDR, C Sigma D and C Sigma L of the Models 2-5 with the suction speed of 9 m/s are also at 0 degrees wind direction, with the maximum reduction rates of 61.8%, 65.8% and 5.7% for the Models 2, 2 and 5 respectively, which indicates that the combined aerodynamic control is more effective on the drag reduction than the passive or active aerodynamic control individually, and the Model 2 with suction control has the best wind-resistant performance. This study contributes to an effective aerodynamic measure to control the amplitude characteristics of wind loads on tall buildings, which can be an important reference for further studies or potential engineering applications of the combined aerodynamic control in mitigating the wind loads and wind-induced responses of tall buildings.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aerodynamic characteristics of tall building with wind turbines at corners
    Wang, Zhuoran
    Chen, Wenliang
    Hong, Hao
    Hu, Gang
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (10)
  • [2] Aerodynamic modifications for reduction of wind loads on cross plan shaped tall building
    Kumar, Debasish
    Dalui, Sujit Kumar
    WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2021, 33 (02) : 123 - 139
  • [3] Control of aerodynamic instabilities of tall building with various wind directions
    Suzuki, M
    Yamamoto, M
    Tamura, T
    WIND ENGINEERING INTO THE 21ST CENTURY, VOLS 1-3, 1999, : 691 - 698
  • [4] Experimental investigation on the aerodynamic characteristics of a tall building subjected to twisted wind
    Zhou, Lei
    Tse, K. T.
    Hu, Gang
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2022, 224
  • [5] Energy sink outrigger control of a tall building under wind loads
    Ndemanou, Buris Peggy
    Tekam, Gabin T. Oumbe
    Kingni, Sifeu Takougang
    Nbendjo, Blaise Romeo Nana
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 288
  • [6] Wind-induced responses of tall buildings under combined aerodynamic control
    Zheng, Chaorong
    Xie, Yu
    Khan, Mahram
    Wu, Yue
    Liu, Jing
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 175 : 86 - 100
  • [7] EQUIVALENT STATIC WIND LOADS FOR TALL BUILDING DESIGN
    SIMIU, E
    JOURNAL OF THE STRUCTURAL DIVISION-ASCE, 1978, 104 (04): : 719 - 725
  • [8] EQUIVALENT STATIC WIND LOADS FOR TALL BUILDING DESIGN
    DAVENPORT, AG
    JOURNAL OF THE STRUCTURAL DIVISION-ASCE, 1977, 103 (02): : 463 - 467
  • [9] EQUIVALENT STATIC WIND LOADS FOR TALL BUILDING DESIGN
    SIMIU, E
    JOURNAL OF THE STRUCTURAL DIVISION-ASCE, 1976, 102 (04): : 719 - 737
  • [10] EQUIVALENT STATIC WIND LOADS FOR TALL BUILDING DESIGN
    PANOFSKY, HA
    JOURNAL OF THE STRUCTURAL DIVISION-ASCE, 1977, 103 (04): : 925 - 925