Green Growth in the OECD Countries: A Multivariate Analytical Approach

被引:17
|
作者
Gavurova, Beata [1 ]
Megyesiova, Silvia [2 ]
Hudak, Matej [2 ]
机构
[1] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Fac Econ & Management, Ctr Appl Econ Res, Zlin 76001, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Econ Bratislava, Fac Business Econ, Kosice 04130, Slovakia
关键词
green growth; OECD; productivity; intensity; exposure to ambient PM2.5; municipal waste; public health; correlation; principal component analysis; cluster analysis; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; MEMBER COUNTRIES; CONVERGENCE; ECONOMY; SIGMA;
D O I
10.3390/en14206719
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Green growth is about merging environmental and social protection with economic growth. The OECD countries follow the progress toward greening though a set of indicators. The aim of the study is to analyze the condition and development of the OECD countries using a set of green growth indicators. The univariate and multivariate statistical approach was used to identify the main features of green growth development in two time spans. The achieved success of the OECD countries toward the green growth was measured from period 1 (years 2000-2009) to period 2 (years 2010-2019). For stimulant indicators, an increase was achieved, while for the destimulant variables, a decrease was reached between the analyzed periods. CO2 productivity increased by more than 31%, material productivity by 25%, and the energy productivity by nearly 21%. From the ecological point of view, a positive sign was achieved by an intensive increase of the percentage of municipal waste treatment by recycling or composting. The real GDP increased between periods in each of the OECD countries, except in Greece. The destimulant indicators decreased over time. The mortality declined by about 20% from exposure to ambient PM2.5 and thus the welfare costs of premature death from exposure to PM2.5 also declined. The decline of the mean population exposure to PM2.5 by 12.5% on average for the OECD countries is a positive signal for environmental protection and public health of the OECD population. Some uncertainty exists as the municipal waste generated per capita decreased only slightly by 2%.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Green Economy in Sustainable Development: An Analysis for OECD Countries
    Babacan, Adem
    Polat, Mehmet Ali
    Kizilkaya, Oktay
    ISTANBUL IKTISAT DERGISI-ISTANBUL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2023, 73 (01): : 231 - 260
  • [22] GREEN GROWTH IN TAIWAN - AN APPLICATION OF THE OECD GREEN GROWTH MONITORING INDICATORS
    Lee, Chien-Ming
    Chou, Hsuan-Hsuan
    SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 63 (02) : 249 - 274
  • [23] Macroeconomic Determinants of Credit Growth in OECD Countries
    Al-Shammari, Nayef
    El-Sakka, Mohammed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2018, 23 (03): : 217 - 234
  • [24] Is Growth In The European Union Countries Green?
    Kasztelan, Armand
    VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, AND GLOBAL GROWTH, VOLS I-IX, 2017, 2017, : 1593 - 1603
  • [25] Generation mix and GDP growth in OECD countries
    Harnphattananusorn, Supanee
    Puttitanun, Thitima
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (09)
  • [26] Stochastic analysis of the economic growth of OECD countries
    De La Fuente-Mella, Hanns
    Maria Vallina-Hernandez, Ana
    Fuentes-Solis, Rodrigo
    ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2020, 33 (01): : 2189 - 2202
  • [27] Human capital and economic growth in OECD countries
    Middendorf, Torge
    JAHRBUCHER FUR NATIONALOKONOMIE UND STATISTIK, 2006, 226 (06): : 670 - 686
  • [28] Growth differentials in OECD countries: some reflections
    Dirk Pilat
    International Economics and Economic Policy, 2005, 2 (1) : 1 - 6
  • [29] Growth and convergence of the OECD countries: A multi-sector production-frontier approach
    Walheer, Barnabe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 252 (02) : 665 - 675
  • [30] QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CIRCULAR ECONOMY IN THE OECD COUNTRIES
    Cautisanu, Cristina
    Asandului, Laura
    Borza, Mioara
    Turturean, Ciprian
    AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC, 2018, 20 (48) : 262 - 277