Party mandates and the politics of attention: Party platforms, public priorities and the policy agenda in Britain

被引:36
作者
Froio, Caterina [1 ]
Bevan, Shaun [2 ]
Jennings, Will [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sci Po Paris, Ctr Etud Europeennes, Paris, France
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Quantitat Polit Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Southampton, Polit Sci & Publ Policy, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Ctr Citizenship Globalisat & Governance, Southampton, Hants, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
party mandate; policy agendas; problem-solving; public opinion; ISSUE OWNERSHIP; UNITED-KINGDOM; MASS-MEDIA; GOVERNMENT; REPRESENTATION; DYNAMICS; MODEL; RESPONSIVENESS; INSTITUTIONS; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1177/1354068815625228
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article develops an attention-based model of party mandates and policy agendas, where parties and governments are faced with an abundance of issues and must divide their scarce attention across them. In government, parties must balance their desire to deliver on their electoral mandate (i.e. the promissory agenda') with a need to continuously adapt their policy priorities in response to changes in public concerns and to deal with unexpected events and the emergence of new problems (i.e. the anticipatory agenda'). Parties elected to office also have incentives to respond to issues prioritized by the platforms of their rivals. To test this theory, time series cross-sectional models are used to investigate how the policy content of the legislative program of British government responds to governing and opposition party platforms, the executive agenda, issue priorities of the public and mass media.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 703
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Adams James., 2001, PARTY COMPETITION RE
[2]  
Adler S.E., 2012, Congress and the politics of problem solving
[3]  
APSA (American Political Science Association), 1950, MOR RESP 2 PART SYST
[4]   A question of trust: Implementing party manifestos [J].
Bara, J .
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, 2005, 58 (03) :585-599
[5]   Comparative Studies of Policy Dynamics [J].
Baumgartner, Frank R. ;
Jones, Bryan D. ;
Wilkerson, John .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2011, 44 (08) :947-972
[6]   Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective [J].
Baumgartner, Frank R. ;
Breunig, Christian ;
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer ;
Jones, Bryan D. ;
Mortensen, Peter B. ;
Nuytemans, Michiel ;
Walgrave, Stefaan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 53 (03) :603-620
[7]   Representation, agendas and institutions [J].
Bevan, Shaun ;
Jennings, Will .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 53 (01) :37-56
[8]   Keeping party programmes on track: the transmission of the policy agendas of executive speeches to legislative outputs in the United Kingdom [J].
Bevan, Shaun ;
John, Peter ;
Jennings, Will .
EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2011, 3 (03) :395-417
[9]  
Birkland T.A., 1997, DISASTER AGENDA SETT
[10]   DO PARTIES MAKE A DIFFERENCE - PARTIES AND THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT IN LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES [J].
BLAIS, A ;
BLAKE, D ;
DION, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 37 (01) :40-62