Nesting local forestry initiatives: Revisiting community forest management in a REDD plus world

被引:93
作者
Hayes, Tanya [1 ]
Persha, Lauren [2 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Univ, Inst Publ Serv, Seattle, WA 98122 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Decentralization; Forest conservation; Joint forest management; Institutional analysis; Tanzania; Central America; REDUCING EMISSIONS; DEGRADATION REDD; LAND-USE; GOVERNANCE; DECENTRALIZATION; DEFORESTATION; LIVELIHOODS; INSTITUTIONS; CONSERVATION; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Understanding the relationship between components of varied decentralized governance models for community or collaborative management and forest conservation outcomes has taken on renewed importance in the context of community engagement in forest conservation efforts through policies to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). In this paper, we synthesize lessons front two comparative case studies of decentralized forest management in Mesoamerica and East Africa in order to examine the institutional factors that contribute to successful tropical forest management in developing countries and, draw insights for policymakers regarding how national policy initiatives. including REDD+, might better embed local level institutions for forest management within broader state institutions and promote more positive local livelihoods and forest conservation outcomes. The case studies presented in this synthesis used a consistent research framework to gather data on forestry reforms, governance processes, local forest institutions, household forest uses and forest conservation outcomes. Our synthesis suggests that successful sustained forest management depends on institutional arrangements that (1) establish local resident rulemaking autonomy, (2) facilitate the flow of external financial and institutional assistance for monitoring and enforcement of local rules, and (3) buffer residents and their respective local institutions from more powerful, and at times corrupt, actors and agencies involved in forest exploitation. The results particularly suggest a role for external, independent non-governmental organizations to help mediate demands on local forest governance systems in nested contexts. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 553
页数:9
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources [J].
Agrawal, A .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1649-1672
[2]  
Agrawal A., 2007, INT J COMMONS, V1, P111, DOI [DOI 10.18352/IJC.10, 10.18352/ijc.10]
[3]  
Agrawal A.Angelsen., 2009, Using community forest management to achieve REDD+ goals
[4]   Changing governance of the world's forests [J].
Agrawal, Arun ;
Chhatre, Ashwini ;
Hardin, Rebecca .
SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5882) :1460-1462
[5]   State involvement and forest co-governance: Evidence from the Indian Himalayas [J].
Agrawal, Arun ;
Chhatre, Ashwini .
STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 42 (1-2) :67-86
[6]   REDD models and baselines [J].
Angelsen, A. .
INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2008, 10 (03) :465-475
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DO TREES GROW MONEY
[8]   Community-based Narwhal management in Nunavut, Canada: Change, uncertainty, and adaptation [J].
Armitage, DR .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2005, 18 (08) :715-731
[9]   Tropical forest carbon assessment: integrating satellite and airborne mapping approaches [J].
Asner, Gregory P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 4 (03)
[10]  
Berkes F, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V5