Technological innovation versus non-technological innovation: different conditions in different regional contexts?

被引:33
作者
Garcia Alvarez-Coque, Jose Maria [1 ]
Mas-Verdu, Francisco [1 ]
Roig-Tierno, Norat [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Valencia, Spain
[2] ESIC Business & Mkt Sch, Valencia, Spain
关键词
fsQCA; Qualitative comparative analysis; Technological and nontechnological innovation; Region; Public investment; Private investment; Human capital; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; NETWORKS; SUBSIDIES; SYSTEMS; SPILLOVERS; COMPLEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-016-0394-2
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study identifies the conditions that, at a regional level, facilitate the emergence of technological and non-technological innovation. One of the most promising lines in the discussion of the processes of regional innovation lies in explaining the different conditions of the various forms innovation process can take. We use fsQCA methodology to test the model. QCA is a method based on set theory that assumes the influence of certain elements in a specific outcome that depend on the combination of those elements; not just on the levels of the individual elements, as in traditional methods. First, we found that the absence of a single condition appears limiting for both types of innovation, which calls for customized innovation policies tailored to the regional context. Second, we found that some sets of innovation characteristics are sufficient conditions for regions to innovate. Among the selected sets, we found that the combination of firm collaboration and public and private R&D are sufficient for both types of innovation, which should be informative for regional policy. The fsQCA also identified alternative pathways-different for both types of innovation. Collaboration seems to be relevant since it is present in all the configurations for sufficient conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1955 / 1967
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Afonso O., 2012, ECON MODEL, V3, P370
  • [2] The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany
    Almus, M
    Czarnitzki, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) : 226 - 236
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to EU Cohesion Policy
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, FORUM QUAL SOZ FORUM, DOI DOI 10.17169/FQS-14.3.1961
  • [5] Perceived usefulness of innovation programs for high-tech and low-tech firms
    Antonio Belso-Martinez, Jose
    Xavier Molina-Morales, F.
    Mas-Verdu, Francisco
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2013, 51 (06) : 1190 - 1206
  • [6] Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation
    Bathelt, H
    Malmberg, A
    Maskell, P
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2004, 28 (01) : 31 - 56
  • [7] Breschi S, 2010, HANDBOOK OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, P353
  • [8] Camagni R., 2012, REG STUD, V2, P1
  • [9] Camagni R, 2009, ADV SPAT SCI, P145, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70924-4_7
  • [10] Networks and Innovation: The Role of Social Assets in Explaining Firms' Innovative Capacity
    Cantner, Uwe
    Conti, Elisa
    Meder, Andreas
    [J]. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2010, 18 (12) : 1937 - 1956