Abbreviated-protocol screening MRI vs. complete-protocol diagnostic MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: An equivalence study using LI-RADS v2018

被引:57
作者
Khatri, Gaurav [1 ]
Pedrosa, Ivan [1 ]
Ananthakrishnan, Lakshmi [1 ]
de Leon, Alberto Diaz [1 ]
Fetzer, David T. [1 ]
Leyendecker, John [1 ]
Singal, Amit G. [2 ]
Xi, Yin [1 ]
Yopp, Adam [3 ]
Yokoo, Takeshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Radiol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Internal Med, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; liver cancer; cirrhosis; screening; early detection; abbreviated MRI; LI-RADS; ENHANCED MRI; SURVEILLANCE; PERFORMANCE; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY; GADOBUTROL; FEATURES; CANCER; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.26835
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The high operational cost of MRI limits its utility for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. Abbreviated-protocol dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (aMRI) may help lower cost while maintaining the high accuracy of complete-protocol diagnostic MRI (cMRI). Purpose To compare aMRI to cMRI for HCC detection in cirrhosis patients. Study Type Cross-sectional study. Study Population Cirrhosis patients undergoing MRI for suspected HCC. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5T and 3T; aMRI (coronal T-2-weighted, axial dynamic contrast-enhanced T-1-weighted fat-suppressed sequences); cMRI (aMRI sequences and unenhanced axial T-2-, T-1-, and diffusion-weighted sequences). Assessment From each cMRI, an abbreviated exam was created by extracting only the aMRI sequences. Five radiologists independently reviewed aMRI and cMRI and assigned per-patient screening results by the presence/absence of any actionable observation per Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System v2018 (LI-RADS 4, 5, M, or TIV categories). Per-patient HCC status was determined by the composite reference standard of histopathology, follow-up imaging, consensus expert panel imaging review, and clinical follow-up. Statistical Tests Interreader agreement between aMRI and cMRI was compared with that of cMRI and tested for interchangeability against a tolerance margin of 0.05. Per-patient screening sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between aMRI and cMRI and tested for equivalence against a tolerance margin of 0.05. Results In 93 cirrhosis patients, five radiologists recorded on average 121 liver observations. Interreader screening agreement probability (and 95% confidence interval confidence interval [CI]) was 0.914 [0.900, 0.926] between aMRI and cMRI, and 0.927 [0.908, 0.942] for cMRI; their difference was within the 0.05 margin for interchangeability. In 86 patients in whom a final HCC status could be determined, the detection sensitivity and specificity of aMRI was 0.921 [0.864, 0.956] and 0.886 [0.844, 0.918], within the 5% equivalence margin to cMRI, 0.936 [0.881, 0.965] and 0.883 [0.840, 0.915], respectively. Data Conclusion Abbreviated-protocol screening MRI is interchangeable with, and equivalent to, complete-protocol diagnostic MRI for per-patient HCC detection in cirrhosis. Technical Efficacy: Stage 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:415-425.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 425
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Long-term evolution of LR-2, LR-3 and LR-4 observations in HBV-related cirrhosis based on LI-RADS v2018 using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Fei Xing
    Tao Zhang
    Xiaofen Miao
    Jiang Lu
    Shen Du
    Jifeng Jiang
    Wei Xing
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 3703 - 3713
  • [22] LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features
    Wang, Di
    Zhang, Yang
    Lyu, Rong
    Jia, Kefeng
    Xu, Peng-Ju
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (09) : 3045 - 3055