DNA-protein interaction studies: a historical and comparative analysis

被引:37
作者
Ferraz, Ricardo Andre Campos [1 ,2 ]
Lopes, Ana Lucia Goncalves [1 ,2 ]
da Silva, Jessy Ariana Faria [2 ,3 ]
Moreira, Diana Filipa Viana [1 ,2 ]
Ferreira, Maria Joao Nogueira [1 ,2 ]
de Almeida Coimbra, Silvia Vieira [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Dept Biol, Fac Ciencias, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, LAQV Requimte, Sustainable Chem, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Minho, Braga, Portugal
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ChIP; DNA-footprinting; DNA-protein interaction; EMSA; SELEX; SPR; TRANSCRIPTION-FACTOR-BINDING; SURFACE-PLASMON RESONANCE; CROSS-LINKING; GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS; RNA-POLYMERASE; ULTRAVIOLET-LIGHT; KINETIC-ANALYSIS; CHIP-SEQ; RECOGNITION; ACID;
D O I
10.1186/s13007-021-00780-z
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
DNA-protein interactions are essential for several molecular and cellular mechanisms, such as transcription, transcriptional regulation, DNA modifications, among others. For many decades scientists tried to unravel how DNA links to proteins, forming complex and vital interactions. However, the high number of techniques developed for the study of these interactions made the choice of the appropriate technique a difficult task. This review intends to provide a historical context and compile the methods that describe DNA-protein interactions according to the purpose of each approach, summarise the respective advantages and disadvantages and give some examples of recent uses for each technique. The final aim of this work is to help in deciding which technique to perform according to the objectives and capacities of each research team. Considering the DNA-binding proteins characterisation, filter binding assay and EMSA are easy in vitro methods that rapidly identify nucleic acid-protein binding interactions. To find DNA-binding sites, DNA-footprinting is indeed an easier, faster and reliable approach, however, techniques involving base analogues and base-site selection are more precise. Concerning binding kinetics and affinities, filter binding assay and EMSA are useful and easy methods, although SPR and spectroscopy techniques are more sensitive. Finally, relatively to genome-wide studies, ChIP-seq is the desired method, given the coverage and resolution of the technique. In conclusion, although some experiments are easier and faster than others, when designing a DNA-protein interaction study several concerns should be taken and different techniques may need to be considered, since different methods confer different precisions and accuracies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region [J].
Blat, Y ;
Kleckner, N .
CELL, 1999, 98 (02) :249-259
[2]   LACTOSE REPRESSOR-OPERATOR DNA INTERACTIONS - KINETIC-ANALYSIS BY A SURFACE-PLASMON RESONANCE BIOSENSOR [J].
BONDESON, K ;
FROSTELLKARLSSON, A ;
FAGERSTAM, L ;
MAGNUSSON, G .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 214 (01) :245-251
[3]   PROPERTIES OF FORMALDEHYDE-TREATED NUCLEOHISTONE [J].
BRUTLAG, D ;
SCHLEHUB.C ;
BONNER, J .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1969, 8 (08) :3214-&
[4]  
Buratowski S, 2001, Curr Protoc Pharmacol, VChapter 6, DOI 10.1002/0471141755.ph0608s13
[5]   Advances in the study of protein-DNA interaction [J].
Cai, Yu-Hang ;
Huang, He .
AMINO ACIDS, 2012, 43 (03) :1141-1146
[6]   ULTRAVIOLET-LIGHT INDUCED PREFERENTIAL CROSS-LINKING OF HISTONE H-3 TO DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC-ACID IN CHROMATIN AND NUCLEI OF CHICKEN ERYTHROCYTES [J].
CAO, TM ;
SUNG, MT .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1982, 21 (14) :3419-3427
[7]  
Carpenter ML., 2001, DNA PROTEIN INTERACT, P491, DOI [10.1385/1-59259-208-2:491, DOI 10.1385/1-59259-208-2:491]
[8]   HISTONE-HISTONE PROPINQUITY BY ALDEHYDE FIXATION OF CHROMATIN [J].
CHALKLEY, R ;
HUNTER, C .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1975, 72 (04) :1304-1308
[9]   LOCATION OF DNA ENDS IN P2, 186, P4 AND LAMBDA BACTERIOPHAGE HEADS [J].
CHATTORAJ, DK ;
INMAN, RB .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1974, 87 (01) :11-+
[10]  
Chen HW, 2001, ELECTROPHORESIS, V22, P1894, DOI 10.1002/1522-2683(200106)22:10<1894::AID-ELPS1894>3.0.CO