Trust of the Generation Z in Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Historical Events

被引:0
|
作者
Vinichenko, Mikhail V. [1 ]
Nikiporets-Takigawa, Galina Yu [1 ,2 ]
Oseev, Aleksander A. [3 ]
Rybakova, Marina, V [3 ]
Makushkin, Sergey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian State Social Univ, Moscow, Russia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Old Sch, Trinity Lane, Cambridge, England
[3] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Digitalization; Artificial Intelligence; Generation Z; Historical Events; Trust; EDUCATION; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.9756/INT-JECSE/V14I1.221040
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The article considered the degree of trust of Russian and Slovak students of generation Z (Gen Z) in artificial intelligence (Al) in the assessment of historical events in the conditions of digital society. The basic empirical methods of the study were a sociological survey and focus group conducted in the context of the COVID 19 pandemic remotely using the resources of the online Google Form and cloud conference platform Zoom. The study found that the attitude of Gen Z to Al in the context of digitalization of society is ambiguous and contradictory, which affects the degree of trust in the assessment of historical events. The degree of trust of Russian and Slovak Gen Z students in the general issues of the use of Al, the assessment of historical events by Al generally coincide on fundamental issues and have some contradictions on secondary ones. The analysis of the research data showed that Russian and Slovak Gen Z students have a generally positive attitude to historical information coming from Al. Differences in the degree of trust (not trust) between Russian and Slovak Gen Z students in the presentation of historical information to them by the Al, contradiction in the evaluation of individual historical events were revealed. Gen Z is wary of Al, believing that Al is dangerous for humans and should not be fully trusted in all matters of presentation and assessment of historical events.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 334
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trust in medical artificial intelligence: a discretionary account
    Nickel, Philip J.
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [42] How transparency modulates trust in artificial intelligence
    Zerilli, John
    Bhatt, Umang
    Weller, Adrian
    PATTERNS, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [43] Trust Management for Artificial Intelligence: A Standardization Perspective
    Um, Tai-Won
    Kim, Jinsul
    Lim, Sunhwan
    Lee, Gyu Myoung
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [44] The effects of personality and locus of control on trust in humans versus artificial intelligence
    Sharan, Navya Nishith
    Romano, Daniela Maria
    HELIYON, 2020, 6 (08)
  • [45] Trust in and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Medicine: Mixed Methods Study
    Shevtsova, Daria
    Ahmed, Anam
    Boot, Iris W. A.
    Sanges, Carmen
    Hudecek, Michael
    Jacobs, John J. L.
    Hort, Simon
    Vrijhoef, Hubertus J. M.
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 11
  • [46] A Streamlit-based Artificial Intelligence Trust Platform for Next-Generation Wireless Networks
    Kuzlu, Murat
    Catak, Ferhat Ozgur
    Sarp, Salih
    Cali, Umit
    Gueler, Oezguer
    2022 IEEE FUTURE NETWORKS WORLD FORUM, FNWF, 2022, : 94 - 97
  • [47] Trust and Trust-Engineering in Artificial Intelligence Research: Theory and Praxis
    Chen M.
    Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (4) : 1429 - 1447
  • [48] Artificial Intelligence for Student Assessment: A Systematic Review
    Gonzalez-Calatayud, Victor
    Prendes-Espinosa, Paz
    Roig-Vila, Rosabel
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [49] The Challenges of Learning Assessment in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
    Goncalves, Bruno F.
    Patricio, Maria Raquel
    Comiche, Amalia
    GOOD PRACTICES AND NEW PERSPECTIVES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 4, WORLDCIST 2024, 2024, 988 : 23 - 32
  • [50] How Perceived Lack of Benevolence Harms Trust of Artificial Intelligence Management
    Li, Mingyu
    Bitterly, T. Bradford
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 109 (11) : 1794 - 1816