Trust of the Generation Z in Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Historical Events

被引:0
|
作者
Vinichenko, Mikhail V. [1 ]
Nikiporets-Takigawa, Galina Yu [1 ,2 ]
Oseev, Aleksander A. [3 ]
Rybakova, Marina, V [3 ]
Makushkin, Sergey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian State Social Univ, Moscow, Russia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Old Sch, Trinity Lane, Cambridge, England
[3] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Digitalization; Artificial Intelligence; Generation Z; Historical Events; Trust; EDUCATION; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.9756/INT-JECSE/V14I1.221040
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The article considered the degree of trust of Russian and Slovak students of generation Z (Gen Z) in artificial intelligence (Al) in the assessment of historical events in the conditions of digital society. The basic empirical methods of the study were a sociological survey and focus group conducted in the context of the COVID 19 pandemic remotely using the resources of the online Google Form and cloud conference platform Zoom. The study found that the attitude of Gen Z to Al in the context of digitalization of society is ambiguous and contradictory, which affects the degree of trust in the assessment of historical events. The degree of trust of Russian and Slovak Gen Z students in the general issues of the use of Al, the assessment of historical events by Al generally coincide on fundamental issues and have some contradictions on secondary ones. The analysis of the research data showed that Russian and Slovak Gen Z students have a generally positive attitude to historical information coming from Al. Differences in the degree of trust (not trust) between Russian and Slovak Gen Z students in the presentation of historical information to them by the Al, contradiction in the evaluation of individual historical events were revealed. Gen Z is wary of Al, believing that Al is dangerous for humans and should not be fully trusted in all matters of presentation and assessment of historical events.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 334
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measuring and Calibrating Trust in Artificial Intelligence
    Bollaert, Mathias
    Augereau, Olivier
    Coppin, Gilles
    DESIGN FOR EQUALITY AND JUSTICE, INTERACT 2023, PT II, 2024, 14536 : 232 - 237
  • [32] Trust in artificial intelligence for medical diagnoses
    Juravle, Georgiana
    Boudouraki, Andriana
    Terziyska, Miglena
    Rezlescu, Constantin
    REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 253 : 263 - 282
  • [33] How Much to Trust Artificial Intelligence?
    Hurlburt, George
    IT PROFESSIONAL, 2017, 19 (04) : 7 - 11
  • [34] Trust in artificial intelligence: a survey experiment to assess trust in algorithmic decision-making
    Orban, Ferenc
    Stefkovics, Adam
    AI & SOCIETY, 2025,
  • [35] Applied artificial intelligence and trust-The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices
    Hengstler, Monika
    Enkel, Ellen
    Duelli, Selina
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 105 : 105 - 120
  • [36] Trust in artificial intelligence within production management - an exploration of antecedents
    Sassmannshausen, Till
    Burggraef, Peter
    Wagner, Johannes
    Hassenzahl, Marc
    Heupel, Thomas
    Steinberg, Fabian
    ERGONOMICS, 2021, 64 (10) : 1333 - 1350
  • [37] Examining Correlation Between Trust and Transparency with Explainable Artificial Intelligence
    Kartikeya, Arnav
    INTELLIGENT COMPUTING, VOL 2, 2022, 507 : 353 - 358
  • [38] Acceptance and Use of Artificial Intelligence in Online Tourism Services by Generation Z in Saudi Arabia
    Abed, Salma S.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 164533 - 164542
  • [39] Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Exploring the Influence of Model Presentation and Model Interaction on Trust in a Medical Setting
    Wunn, Tina
    Sent, Danielle
    Peute, Linda W. P.
    Leijnen, Stefan
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ECAI 2023 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPS, PT 2, XAI3, TACTIFUL, XI-ML, SEDAMI, RAAIT, AI4S, HYDRA, AI4AI, 2023, 2024, 1948 : 76 - 86
  • [40] Trust in medical artificial intelligence: a discretionary account
    Philip J. Nickel
    Ethics and Information Technology, 2022, 24