Susceptibility-Weighted MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Capillary Telangiectasia of the Brain

被引:28
作者
El-Koussy, M. [1 ,4 ]
Schroth, G. [1 ]
Gralla, J. [1 ]
Brekenfeld, C. [1 ]
Andres, R. H. [2 ]
Jung, S. [3 ]
Shahin, M. A. [4 ]
Lovblad, K. O. [5 ]
Kiefer, C. [1 ]
Kottke, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inselspital, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Neuroradiol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Inselspital, Dept Neurosurg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Inselspital, Dept Neurol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[4] Cairo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cairo, Egypt
[5] Univ Geneva, Dept Neuroradiol, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS; CAVERNOUS MALFORMATION; SINGLE PATIENT; STEM; VENOGRAPHY; JUXTAPOSITION; PONS;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A2893
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: BCT is a benign entity, whose appearance on conventional MR imaging makes its differentiation from neoplastic, inflammatory, or subacute ischemic disease challenging. SWI is sensitive to susceptibility effects from deoxyhemoglobin with excellent spatial resolution. Only scarce case reports have described the utility of SWI in cases of BCT. Our aim was to show the diagnostic value of SWI applied to a larger series of cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational retrospective study of 33 BCTs in 27 consecutive patients examined from August 2009 to January 2011 with MR imaging, including SWI. Morphology, signal intensity characteristics, and additional vascular malformations were analyzed. Preceding or follow-up examinations were available in 18 patients with a median time interval of 14.5 months (range, 2-115 months). RESULTS: Twenty-five pontine and 8 supratentorial BCTs demonstrated distinct signal-intensity loss on SWI in combination with postcontrast enhancement. Mean lesion diameter was 4.9 mm (range, 1.5-17 mm). Thirty-nine percent showed slight signal-intensity changes on T1 and/or T2; the remainder were isointense to normal brain. In 30%, a prominent draining vessel was observed. Additional cerebral vascular malformations were found in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: SWI represents a valuable tool for confirmation of presumed BCT. Demonstration of signal-intensity loss on SWI in an enhancing focal brain lesion, otherwise unremarkable on conventional MR images, is highly specific for BCT, thus excluding serious pathology and reassuring the patient and referring physician. This is particularly helpful for BCT in less typical locations.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 720
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Developmental venous anomaly, cavernous malformation, and capillary telangiectasia: spectrum of a single disease [J].
Abla, A. ;
Wait, S. D. ;
Uschold, T. ;
Lekovic, G. P. ;
Spetzler, R. F. .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2008, 150 (05) :487-489
[2]  
Auffray-Calvier E, 1999, J NEURORADIOLOGY, V26, P257
[3]  
Barr RM, 1996, AM J NEURORADIOL, V17, P71
[4]   Pontine capillary telangiectasia as visualized on MR imaging causing a clinical picture resembling basilar-type migraine: a case report [J].
Beukers, Richard Johan ;
Roos, Yvo B. W. E. M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 256 (10) :1775-1777
[5]   Two cases of benign cerebral telangiectasis [J].
Blackwood, W .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY, 1941, 52 (02) :209-U46
[6]   The juxtaposition of a capillary telangiectasia, cavernous malformation, and developmental venous anomaly in the brainstem of a single patient: Case report [J].
Bonneville, F ;
Cattin, F ;
Bonneville, JF .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (03) :850-851
[7]  
Castillo M, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P1553
[8]  
Chaloupka JC, 1998, NEUROIMAG CLIN N AM, V8, P295
[9]   The juxtaposition of a capillary telangiectasia, cavernous malformation, and developmental venous anomaly in the brainstem of a single patient: Case report [J].
Clatterbuck, RE ;
Elmaci, I ;
Rigamonti, D .
NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 49 (05) :1246-1250
[10]   Susceptibility-weighted imaging of the brain: Does gadolinium administration matter? [J].
El-Koussy, Marwan ;
Schenk, Pascal ;
Kiefer, Claus ;
Osman, Omar M. ;
Mordasini, Pasquale ;
Ozdoba, Christoph ;
Schroth, Gerhard ;
Goenner, Friedrich .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (02) :272-276