Ambivalence in Living Liver Donors

被引:20
|
作者
Simpson, Mary Ann [1 ]
Kendrick, Julia [3 ]
Verbesey, Jennifer E. [1 ]
Morin, Denise S. [1 ]
Dew, Mary Amanda [2 ]
Trabucco, Agnes [1 ]
Pomposelli, James J. [1 ]
Pomfret, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lahey Clin Fdn, Dept Transplantat, Burlington, MA 01805 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Tufts Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RIGHT LOBE GRAFTS; KIDNEY DONORS; TRANSPLANTATION; DONATION; INTERVIEW; OUTCOMES; CONSENT; SF-36;
D O I
10.1002/lt.22342
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
All right hepatic lobe (RHL) donors in our program are asked to participate in a longitudinal quality-of-life study that begins at their evaluation and continues throughout the first postdonation year. Here we report the characteristics of donor candidates who completed the donation process despite ambivalence. In all, 183 RHL candidates consented, and 133 became donors. Ambivalent donors (ADs; n = 45) identified themselves through verbal statements or written comments, or they were identified by staff during the evaluation. ADs were predominantly male (73.3%), were older than unambivalent donors (UADs; > 35 years: 76% of ADs versus 53% of UADs, P = 0.008), and were well educated (college graduate: 60% of ADs versus 17% of UADs, P = 0.01). Brother-to-brother and son-to-father combinations were most common among ADs. Alcohol (22% versus 11%, P = 0.04) and hepatitis C virus (51% versus 27%, P = 0.008) were more common as disease etiologies for recipients with ADs versus recipients with UADs. More ADs than UADs considered themselves to be religious (68.9% versus 43.2%, P = 0.007). Ambivalence about RHL donation was present in 33.8% of the candidates who completed the donation process. These results suggest that ambivalence should not be the sole reason for disqualifying a potential donor who otherwise satisfies program requirements. Liver Transpl 17: 1226-1233, 2011. (C) 2011 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:1226 / 1233
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of decision ambivalence and the differences between actual living liver donors and potential living liver donors
    Weng, Li-Chueh
    Huang, Hsiu-Li
    Tsai, Hsiu-Hsin
    Lee, Wei-Chen
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [2] Motives and Decision Making of Potential Living Liver Donors: Comparisons Between Gender, Relationships and Ambivalence
    DiMartini, A.
    Cruz, R. J., Jr.
    Dew, M. A.
    Fitzgerald, M. G.
    Chiappetta, L.
    Myaskovsky, L.
    DeVera, M. E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (01) : 136 - 151
  • [3] Checking the harness: Safety for living liver donors
    Simpson, Mary Ann
    Pomfret, Elizabeth A.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 : S15 - S19
  • [4] Systematic Review of the Safety of Living Liver Donors
    Zhong Jinjing
    Lei Jianyong
    Wang Wentao
    Yan Lunan
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (122) : 252 - 257
  • [5] Outcomes Among Living Liver Donors
    Trotter, James F.
    Everhart, James E.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 142 (02) : 207 - 210
  • [6] Resilience and personality traits among living liver and kidney donors
    Rudow, Dianne LaPointe
    Iacoviello, Brian M.
    Charney, Dennis
    PROGRESS IN TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 24 (01) : 82 - 90
  • [7] The long-term follow-up of the living liver donors
    De Carlis, Riccardo
    Di Lucca, Gabriele
    Lauterio, Andrea
    Centonze, Leonardo
    De Carlis, Luciano
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2024,
  • [8] Investigation of life satisfaction and spiritual well-being of living liver donors in Turkey
    Gunes, Huseyin
    Bulbuloglu, Semra
    Saritas, Serdar
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, : 5654 - 5661
  • [9] Anxiety, pain intensity, and decision regret of living liver donors during postoperative period
    Tseng, Su-Chen
    Lee, Wei-Chen
    Chen, Kang-Hua
    Tsai, Hsiu-Hsin
    Kuo, Mei-Chen
    Weng, Li-Chueh
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2023, 69
  • [10] Psychological evaluation of living liver donors - a single centre experience
    Papachristou, C.
    Walter, M.
    Klapp, B. F.
    ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2010, 73 (03) : 383 - 388