Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate

被引:60
作者
Anshu, Arundhati [1 ,2 ]
Price, Marianne O. [2 ]
Price, Francis W., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornea Res Fdn Amer, Indianapolis, IN 46260 USA
[2] Price Vis Grp, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RISK-FACTORS; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; REJECTION; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; EYES; DONOR; COMPLICATIONS; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Design: Retrospective interventional case series. Participants: Sixty eyes (60 patients) treated at Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana. Methods: Graft diameters ranged from 8 to 9 mm and were similar to 1 mm larger than the previous PK. The Descemet's membrane was not stripped in the majority (54, 84%). The graft was inserted using forceps or a Busin funnel glide (Moria, Anthony, France). The probability of graft survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Graft survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Results: The mean recipient age was 68 years (range, 17-95 years). Forty eyes had 1 previous failed PK, 14 eyes had 2 previous failed PKs, and 6 eyes had 3 previous failed PKs. Thirty-one eyes (52%) had preexisting glaucoma, and 16 eyes (27%) had prior glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy in 4, shunt procedure in 12). Fifty-five grafts were performed for visual rehabilitation, and 5 grafts were performed for pain relief. Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 2 months to 6 years). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0.2-3, Snellen 20/340), and median postoperative visual improvement was 0.6 logMAR (6 lines), range -0.3 to +2.7. Four eyes had graft detachment (6.6%), 7 eyes (10.5%) had endothelial rejection, and 10 eyes (16.6%) had graft failure (primary failure in 2, secondary failure in 8). The overall secondary graft survival rates were 98%, 90%, 81%, and 74% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Prior glaucoma shunt was the principal risk factor for graft failure. The graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, 96%, and 96% in eyes without a prior shunt versus 93%, 74%, 44%, and 22% with a prior shunt at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (P = 0.0005; relative risk = 20). Peripheral anterior synechiae (P = 0.14), neovascularization (P = 0.88), endothelial rejection (P = 0.59), and number of prior PKs (P = 0.13) were not independent risk factors for graft failure. Conclusions: Endothelial keratoplasty under a previous failed PK is a useful alternative to a repeat standard PK, particularly in eyes with an acceptable topography and refractive outcome before failure. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2155-2160 (C) 2011 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:2155 / 2160
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Elevated Intraocular Pressure in Patients Undergoing Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty [J].
Sandhu, Sartaj ;
Petsoglou, Constantinos ;
Grigg, John ;
Veillard, Anne-Sophie .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2016, 25 (04) :390-396
[42]   Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty and glaucoma [J].
Banitt, Michael R. ;
Chopra, Vikas .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 21 (02) :144-149
[43]   Herpetic Keratitis After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Graft [J].
Prasher, Pawan ;
Muftuoglu, Orkun .
Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice, 2009, 35 (01) :41-42
[44]   Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for graft failure following penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Heinzelmann, Sonja ;
Boehringer, Daniel ;
Eberwein, Philipp ;
Lapp, Thabo ;
Reinhard, Thomas ;
Maier, Philip .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 255 (05) :979-985
[45]   Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty [J].
Fuest, Matthias ;
Ang, Marcus ;
Htoon, Hla Myint ;
Tan, Donald ;
Mehta, Jodhbir S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 182 :62-71
[46]   Histopathologic Examination of Failed Grafts in Descemet's Stripping with Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty [J].
Suh, Leejee H. ;
Dawson, Daniel G. ;
Mutapcic, Lejla ;
Rosenfeld, Steven I. ;
Culbertson, William W. ;
Yoo, Sonia H. ;
O'Brien, Terrence P. ;
Dubovy, Sander R. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (04) :603-608
[47]   Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty for primary graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Trindade, Bruno Lovaglio Cancado ;
de Oliveira, Fellype Borges ;
Crepaldi, Leticia Arriel .
ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2024, 87 (04)
[48]   Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Ten-Year Endothelial Cell Loss Compared with Penetrating Keratoplasty [J].
Price, Marianne O. ;
Calhoun, Peter ;
Kollman, Craig ;
Price, Francis W., Jr. ;
Lass, Jonathan H. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 123 (07) :1421-1427
[49]   Comparison of Manual and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty [J].
Sorkin, Nir ;
Mimouni, Michael ;
Santaella, Gisella ;
Trinh, Tanya ;
Cohen, Eyal ;
Einan-Lifshitz, Adi ;
Chan, Clara C. ;
Rootman, David S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 214 :1-8
[50]   Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United States [J].
Prabhu, Shreya S. ;
Kaakeh, Rola ;
Sugar, Alan ;
Smith, Dean G. ;
Shtein, Roni M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 155 (01) :45-53