Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Under Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Rehabilitation and Graft Survival Rate

被引:60
作者
Anshu, Arundhati [1 ,2 ]
Price, Marianne O. [2 ]
Price, Francis W., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornea Res Fdn Amer, Indianapolis, IN 46260 USA
[2] Price Vis Grp, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; RISK-FACTORS; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; REJECTION; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; EYES; DONOR; COMPLICATIONS; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.04.032
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate graft survival, risk factors for failure, complications, and visual rehabilitation in patients who underwent Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) under a failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Design: Retrospective interventional case series. Participants: Sixty eyes (60 patients) treated at Price Vision Group, Indianapolis, Indiana. Methods: Graft diameters ranged from 8 to 9 mm and were similar to 1 mm larger than the previous PK. The Descemet's membrane was not stripped in the majority (54, 84%). The graft was inserted using forceps or a Busin funnel glide (Moria, Anthony, France). The probability of graft survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Graft survival, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. Results: The mean recipient age was 68 years (range, 17-95 years). Forty eyes had 1 previous failed PK, 14 eyes had 2 previous failed PKs, and 6 eyes had 3 previous failed PKs. Thirty-one eyes (52%) had preexisting glaucoma, and 16 eyes (27%) had prior glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy in 4, shunt procedure in 12). Fifty-five grafts were performed for visual rehabilitation, and 5 grafts were performed for pain relief. Median follow-up was 2.3 years (range, 2 months to 6 years). Median preoperative BCVA was 1.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range, 0.2-3, Snellen 20/340), and median postoperative visual improvement was 0.6 logMAR (6 lines), range -0.3 to +2.7. Four eyes had graft detachment (6.6%), 7 eyes (10.5%) had endothelial rejection, and 10 eyes (16.6%) had graft failure (primary failure in 2, secondary failure in 8). The overall secondary graft survival rates were 98%, 90%, 81%, and 74% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Prior glaucoma shunt was the principal risk factor for graft failure. The graft survival rates were 100%, 96%, 96%, and 96% in eyes without a prior shunt versus 93%, 74%, 44%, and 22% with a prior shunt at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively (P = 0.0005; relative risk = 20). Peripheral anterior synechiae (P = 0.14), neovascularization (P = 0.88), endothelial rejection (P = 0.59), and number of prior PKs (P = 0.13) were not independent risk factors for graft failure. Conclusions: Endothelial keratoplasty under a previous failed PK is a useful alternative to a repeat standard PK, particularly in eyes with an acceptable topography and refractive outcome before failure. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2155-2160 (C) 2011 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:2155 / 2160
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Repeat penetrating keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome [J].
Al-Mezaine, H ;
Wagoner, MD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 90 (03) :324-327
[2]   The role of glaucoma therapy in the need for repeat penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Aldave, AJ ;
Rudd, JC ;
Cohen, EJ ;
Rapuano, CJ ;
Laibson, PR .
CORNEA, 2000, 19 (06) :772-776
[3]   Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty [J].
Allan, Bruce D. S. ;
Terry, Mark A. ;
Price, Francis W., Jr. ;
Price, Marianne O. ;
Griffin, Neil B. ;
Claesson, Margareta .
CORNEA, 2007, 26 (09) :1039-1042
[4]   Postoperative Risk Factors Influencing Corneal Graft Survival in the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study [J].
Anshu, Arundhati ;
Lim, Laurence S. ;
Htoon, Hla Myint ;
Tan, Donald T. H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 151 (03) :442-448
[5]   Corneal Neovascularization as a Risk Factor for Graft Failure and Rejection after Keratoplasty An Evidence-Based Meta-analysis [J].
Bachmann, Bjorn ;
Taylor, Rod S. ;
Cursiefen, Claus .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 117 (07) :1300-U42
[6]   The profile of repeated corneal transplantation [J].
Bersudsky, V ;
Blum-Hareuveni, T ;
Rehany, U ;
Rumelt, S .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (03) :461-469
[7]   EFFECT OF FACTORS UNRELATED TO TISSUE MATCHING ON CORNEAL TRANSPLANT ENDOTHELIAL REJECTION [J].
BOISJOLY, HM ;
BERNARD, PM ;
DUBE, I ;
LAUGHREA, PA ;
BAZIN, R ;
BERNIER, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 107 (06) :647-654
[8]   Retrospective Review of Graft Dislocation Rate Associated With Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty After Primary Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty [J].
Clements, John L. ;
Bouchard, Charles S. ;
Lee, W. Barry ;
Dunn, Steven P. ;
Mannis, Mark J. ;
Reidy, James J. ;
John, Thomas ;
Hannush, Sadeer B. ;
Goins, Kenneth M. ;
Wagoner, Michael D. ;
Adi, Marwa A. ;
Rubenstein, Jonathan B. ;
Udell, Ira J. ;
Babiuch, Amy S. .
CORNEA, 2011, 30 (04) :414-418
[9]   Clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in eyes with prior or concurrent penetrating keratoplasties [J].
Coleman, AL ;
Mondino, BJ ;
Wilson, MR ;
Casey, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 123 (01) :54-61
[10]   Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with failed penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Covert, Douglas J. ;
Koenig, Steven B. .
CORNEA, 2007, 26 (06) :692-696