A clinical image preference study comparing digital tomosynthesis with digital radiography for pediatric spinal imaging

被引:1
作者
King, Jenna M. [1 ]
Elbakri, Idris A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reed, Martin [4 ]
Wrogemann, Jens [4 ]
机构
[1] CancerCare Manitoba, Div Med Phys, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Radiol, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Phys & Astron, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[4] Winnipeg Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Radiol, Winnipeg R3A 1R9, MB, Canada
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2011: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT | 2011年 / 7966卷
关键词
digital tomosynthesis; digital radiography; pediatrics; ALARA; image quality; spinal imaging; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1117/12.877733
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic quality of digital tomosynthesis (DT) images for pediatric imaging of the spine. We performed a phantom image rating study to assess the visibility of anatomical spinal structures in DT images relative to digital radiography (DR) and computed tomography (CT). We collected DT and DR images of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine using anthropomorphic phantoms. Four pediatric radiologists and two residents rated the visibility of structures on the DT image sets compared to DR using a four point scale (0 = not visible; 1 = visible; 2 = superior to DR; 3 = excellent, CT unnecessary). In general, the structures in the spine received ratings between 1 and 3 (cervical), or 2 and 3 (thoracic, lumbar), with a few mixed scores for structures that are usually difficult to see on diagnostic images, such as vertebrae near the cervical-thoracic joint and the apophyseal joints of the lumbar spine. The DT image sets allow most critical structures to be visualized as well or better than DR. When DR imaging is inconclusive, DT is a valuable tool to consider before sending a pediatric patient for a higher-dose CT exam.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   New technologies to reduce pediatric radiation doses [J].
Bernhardt, Philipp ;
Lendl, Markus ;
Deinzer, Frank .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2006, 36 :212-215
[2]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[3]   Radiation risk to children from computed tomography [J].
Brody, Alan S. ;
Frush, Donald P. ;
Huda, Walter ;
Brent, Robert L. .
PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (03) :677-682
[4]  
Cooper G, 2008, MUSCULOSKELET MED, P99
[5]   Tomosynthesis imaging: At a translational crossroads [J].
Dobbins, James T., III .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) :1956-1967
[6]  
Giaccia, 2006, RADIOBIOLOGY RADIOLO, VVol 6
[7]  
Gislason A., 2009, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V7258
[8]   Overview of two years of clinical experience of chest tomosynthesis at Sahlgrenska University Hospital [J].
Johnsson, A. A. ;
Vikgren, J. ;
Svalkvist, A. ;
Zachrisson, S. ;
Flinck, A. ;
Boijsen, M. ;
Kheddache, S. ;
Mansson, L. G. ;
Bath, M. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 139 (1-3) :124-129
[9]   Children's exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations [J].
Linet, Martha S. ;
Kim, Kwang pyo ;
Rajaraman, Preetha .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 39 :S4-S26
[10]   ALARA: is there a cause for alarm? Reducing radiation risks from computed tomography scanning in children [J].
Shah, Nikhil Bharat ;
Platt, Shari L. .
CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2008, 20 (03) :243-247